期刊文献+

下磨牙牙周韧带和下齿槽神经阻滞麻醉效果的对照研究 被引量:4

Comparative study in periodontal ligament anesthesia and inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia in mandibular permanent molar
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]评估下颌磨牙急性不可复性牙髓炎行牙周韧带注射麻醉作用,讨论牙周韧带注射麻醉是否可行。[方法]选择100例病人随机平均分成两组,实验组应用STA计算机控制口腔无痛局部麻醉仪进行盐酸阿替卡因牙周韧带麻醉,对照组进行盐酸阿替卡因下齿槽神经阻滞麻醉。注射麻醉后进行牙髓治疗。利用100 mm直观模拟标度尺(VAS)及问卷获得患者牙髓治疗时的痛觉数据。[结果]实验组和对照组疼痛感觉(VAS值)分别是15.36±1.50、14.78±1.50,实验组与对照组疼痛感觉比较差异无显著性意义(P>0.05);问卷调查实验组和对照组对麻醉方式满意率分别是94.0%、74.0%,实验组与对照组麻醉方式满意率比较差异有显著性意义(P<0.01)。[结论]应用STA无痛麻醉仪行牙周韧带注射麻醉可以达到良好的麻醉效果。 [Objective] To assess the anesthetic effect in periodontal ligament in the treatment of mandibular permanent molar irreversible pulpitis and to discuss the feasibility of periodontal ligament anesthesia.[Methods] One hundred patients were randomly divided into two groups evenly.In test group,the patients received the periodontal ligament anesthesia of articaine hydrochloride through using STA computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.In control group,the patients received inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia of articaine hydrochloride.After anesthetic injection,pulp therapy was performed.Data relating to the pain of the treating pulpitis molar were obtained on a 100 mm visual analogue scale(VAS) and a questionnaire.[Results] VAS was 15.36±1.50 in test group and 14.78±1.50 in control group.No statistically significant difference in anesthetic effect was observed between the two groups(P0.05).The result of questionnaire showed satisfaction rates of test group and control group were 94.0% and 74.0% respectively.There was a significant difference in satisfaction with anesthetic methods(P0.01).[Conclusion] The periodontal ligament anesthesia by using STA computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system can attain good anesthetic effect.
出处 《大连医科大学学报》 CAS 2010年第3期305-308,共4页 Journal of Dalian Medical University
关键词 牙周韧带 牙齿槽神经 麻醉 牙髓治疗 periodontal ligament inferior alveolar nerve anesthesia pulp therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献13

  • 1冯齐平,钱玉芬,潘晓岗,储沨婷,杨臣杰.2种量表在评定青少年主观美观程度中的应用[J].上海口腔医学,2006,15(5):500-503. 被引量:8
  • 2McArdle BF. Painless palatal anesthesia[J], J Am Dent Assoc, 1997, 128 (5) : 647.
  • 3Harker T. What injection[J]. Br Dent J, 1997, 182(2):50.
  • 4Meechan JG. Effective topical anesthetic agents and techniques [J]. Dent Clin North Am, 2002, 46(4):759-766.
  • 5Harbert H. Topical ice: A precursor to palatal injections[J]. J Endod, 1989, 15 (1) :27-28.
  • 6Friedman MJ, Hochman MN. A 21st century computerized injection system for local pain control[J]. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 1997, 18(10):995-1000, 1002-1003.
  • 7Meechan JG, Winter RA. A comparison of topical anaesthesia and electronic nerve stimulation for reducing the pain of intraoral injections[J]. Br Dent J, 1996, 181(9):333-335.
  • 8Schulaze-Husmann M. Experimental evaluation of the new local anesthetic ultracaine in dental practice[D]. Bonn: University of Bonn, 1974: 200.
  • 9Mikesell P, Nusstein J, Reader A, et al. A comparison of articaine and lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks[J]. J Endod, 2005, 31 (4) : 265-270.
  • 10Donaldson D, Meechan JG. A comparison of the effects of EMLA cream and topical 5% lidocaine on discomfort during gingival probin[J].Anesth Prog, 1995, 42(1):7-10.

共引文献37

同被引文献39

  • 1Vershot J, Veerkamp SJ, Hoogstraten J, et al. Computer- ized anesthesia delivery system vs, traditional syringe:com- paring pain and pain- related behavior in children [J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2005, 113(6) : 488-493.
  • 2Gary GG, Francis JG, Brian KN, et al. Comparison of a con trolled injection pressure system with a conventional tech nique [J]. Oral Surg Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2000 90(1) : 88-94.
  • 3Clark TM, Yagiela JA. Advanced techniques and armamen- tarium for dental local anesthesia [J]. Dent Clin North Am, 2010, 54(4):757-768.
  • 4Kroehak M, Friedman N. Using a precision metered injection system to minimize dental injection anxiety [J]. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 1998, 19(2) : 137-148.
  • 5Palm AM, Kirkegaard U, Poulsen S. The wand versus tradi- tional injection for mandibular nerve block in children and ad- descents perceived pain and time of onset [J].Pediatr Dent, 2004, 26(6) : 481-484.
  • 6Oztas N, Ulusu T, Bodur H, et al. The wand in pulp thera- py: an alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block [J].Quin- tessence Int, 2005, 36(7-8) : 559-564.
  • 7Fukayama H, Yoshikawa F, Kohase H, et al. Efficacy of anterior and middle superior alveolar(AMSA) anesthesia u- sing a new injection system: the Wand [J]. Quintessence Int, 2003, 34(7) : 537-541.
  • 8Ram D, Kassirer J. Assessment of a palatal approach-ante- rior superior alveolar(P-ASA) nerve block with the Wand in pediatric dental patients [J].Int J Paediatr Dent, 2006, 16 (5) : 348-351.
  • 9Ram D, Peretz B,. Assessing the pain reaction of children re- ceiving periodontal ligament anesthesia using a computerized device(wand) [J].J Clin Pediatr Dent, 200a, 27(3) : 247- 250.
  • 10Gibson RS, Allen K, Hutfless S, et al. The Wand vs. con- ventional injection: a comparison of pain related behaviors [J]. Pediatr Dent, 2000, 22(2): 458-462.

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部