期刊文献+

澜沧短周期巨尾桉工业原料人工林与其原生林林下植物多样性的比较 被引量:3

Comparison of Plants Diversity Undergrowth in Eucalyptus grandis×E. urophylla Short-period Plantations and Primary Forest
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在云南省普洱市澜沧县选取7块3年生短周期巨尾桉工业原料人工林样地和7块其原生林对照样地,对其林下灌木层和草本层进行了调查,依此对其多样性指标进行了比较分析,结果表明,短周期巨尾桉工业原料人工林林下,共有植物94种,隶属46科,主要以一些阳性和半阳性植物为主,其中菊科和禾本科植物较为普遍。对照样地所反映的原生林林下,共有植物167种,隶属49科。短周期巨尾桉工业原料人工林林下生长的植物在其原生林林下几乎都有分布,但不是优势种。短周期巨尾桉工业原料人工林林下的Simpson指数和Shannon-Weiner指数及均匀度指数3个多样性指数均低于其原生林。短周期巨尾桉工业原料人工林林下各植物物种个体数量分布不均匀,优势物种较突出,而原生林林下各物种株数分布比较均匀,优势物种并不突出。 Choosing 7 sample plots of three years old Eucalyptus grandis × E.urophylla plantation and 7 primary sample plots as study targets,the shrub layer and herbaceous layer were investigated,and the diversity indexes were compared and analyzed as well.The results showed that 94 plant species belonging to 46 families were found under plantation,the dominant species were either sun-loving or middle-light plants,Asteraceae and Gramineae were two families generally existed.In the sample plots of primary forests,totally 167 species belonging to 49 families were found.The results also implied that all the undergrowth species in plantations could be found in primary forests,however,these species were not dominant species.The Simpson index,Shannon-Weiner index and evenness index of plantations were all lower than those of primary forests.In summary,the number distribution of undergrowth plant species of plantations were not even,with outstanding dominant species,whereas the number distribution of undergrowth plant species of primary forests were even and without dominant species.
出处 《西部林业科学》 CAS 2010年第2期95-100,共6页 Journal of West China Forestry Science
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划资助项目(2003CB415100)
关键词 澜沧 短周期巨尾桉工业原料人工林 原生林 林下植物 多样性比较 Lancang short-period plantation primary forest undergrowth diversity comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献112

共引文献3431

同被引文献38

  • 1吴建强,阮晓红,王雪.人工湿地中水生植物的作用和选择[J].水资源保护,2005,21(1):1-6. 被引量:127
  • 2温远光,刘世荣,陈放.连栽对桉树人工林下物种多样性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(9):1667-1671. 被引量:110
  • 3陈吉泉.河岸植被特征及其在生态系统和景观中的作用[J].应用生态学报,1996,7(4):439-448. 被引量:246
  • 4de Mazancourt C, Johnson E, Barraclough T G. Biodiversity inhibits species" evolutionary responses to changing environments[J]. Ecology Letters, 2008, 11(4): 380-388.
  • 5Golicher D J, Cayuela L, Alkemade J R M, Gonz á lez- Espinosa M, R.am i rez-Marcial N. Applying climatically associated species pools to the modelling of compositional change in tropical montane forests[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2008, 17(2): 262-273.
  • 6Sullivan G, Callaway J C, Zedler J B. Plant assemblage composition explains and predicts how biodiversity affects salt marsh functioning[J]. Ecological Monographs, 2007, 77(4): 569-590.
  • 7Balvanera P, Pfisterer A B, Buchmann N, He J-S, Nakashizuka T, Raffaelli D, Schmid B. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services[J]. Ecology Letters, 2006, 9(10): 1146-1156.
  • 8Potvin C, Gotelli N J. Biodiversity enhances individual performance but does not affect survivorship in tropical trees[J]. Ecology Letters, 2008, 11(3): 380-388.
  • 9Naeem S. Ecosystem consequences of biodiversity loss: The evolution of a paradigm[J]. Ecology, 2002, 83(6): 1537-1552.
  • 10Fridley J D. Resource availability dominates and alters the relationship between species diversity and ecosystem productivity in experimental plant communities[J]. Oecologia, 2002, 132(2): 271-277.

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部