2Lee, M. J., Tedder, M. C. The effects of three different computer texts on readers' recall: based on working memory capacity. Computers in Human Behavior, 2003, 19:767 - 783
3Mohageg M. F, Graphics S. The influence of hypertext linking structures on the efficiency of information retrieval. Human Factors, 1992,34(3):351 - 367
4McDonald, S., Stevenson, RJ. Disorientation in hypertext: The effects of three text structures on navigation performance. Applied Ergonomics, 1996, 27(1): 61-68
5McDonald S, Stevenson RJ. Effects of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on navigation in hypertext. Human Factors, 1998,40(1): 18-27
6Muter, P., Latremouille, S.A., Treunit, W.C., & Beam, P. Extended reading of continuous text ontelevision screens. Human Factors, 1982,24:501-508
7Muter, P. & Maurutto, P. Reading and skimming from compute screens: the paperless office revisited. Behaviour & lnforrnatio Technology, 1991, 10(4) : 257 - 266
8O' Hara, Kenton & Sellen, Abigail. A Comparison of Reading Paper and On - Line Documents. In Proceedings of CHI'97. New York: ACM Press, 1997:335-342
9Lorch Jr., R.F., Lorch, E.P. & Klusewitz, M.A. College students' conditional knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1993,85 : 239 - 252
10Goldwasser,Amy.What‘s the matter with kids today-Noth-ing,actually Aside from ourpanicthattheInternetismeltingtheirbra-ins. http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2008/03/14/kids_and_internet/ .
