期刊文献+

团队建设性争论、从经验中学习与绩效关系的研究 被引量:15

Study on relationship among team constructive controversy,learning from experience and performance
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以实证的方法在团队层面研究了组织从经验中学习的前因后果.基于团队学习行为(能力)模型构造了团队从经验中学习的知、行两个维度.知维度决定了团队是否能有效将过去的经验转化为知识,行维度则决定了这些知识是否得到了充分的利用以指导行为.这是团队从经验中学习整个过程中最为关键的两个维度.只有知行统一,学习过程才是完整有效的,最终才能转化成绩效.团队建设性争论对团队从经验中学习有显著影响,建设性争论越多,团队从经验中学习的知行维度水平越高.团队从经验中学习对团队绩效有显著影响,从经验中学习的知行维度水平越高,团队绩效越好. Empirical method is used to study the cause and effect of organizational learning from experience on team level. Two dimensions of team leaming from experience--knowing and doing--are constructed based on team learning behavior (capacity) model. Knowing determines the effectiveness of the transformation from experience into knowledge while doing determines whether the knowledge has been taken full advantage of to direct the behavior. These are the most important dimensions of the whole process of team learning from experience. Only unity of knowing and doing can complete the learning process and make it effective, then, performance will be improved. The empirical analysis indicates that team constructive controversy significantly influences team learning from experience, the more constructive controversies, the higher the level of knowing and doing. While team learning from experience significantly influences team performance, the higher the level of knowing and doing, the better the team performance.
作者 陈国权 宁南
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第8期65-77,共13页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家杰出青年基金资助项目(70625003) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70272007 70572005 70321001 70602003) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地基金资助重大项目(06JJD630013)
关键词 组织从经验中学习 团队从经验中学习 知行统一 团队建设性争论 团队绩效 organizational learning from experience team learning from experience unity of knowing and doing team constructive controversy team performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献62

  • 1陈国权,宁南.组织从经验中学习:现状、问题、方向[J].中国管理科学,2009,17(1):157-168. 被引量:16
  • 2Lindblom C E.The science of muddling through[J].Public Administration Review,1959,19(2):79-88.
  • 3Argyris C,Schon D A.Organizational Learning:A Theory of Action Perspective[M].Reading,Massachusetts:Addison-Wesley Publishing Co,1978.
  • 4Argyris C,Schon D A.Organizational Learning II:Theory,method and practice[M].Reading,Massachusetts:Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.1996.
  • 5Quinn J B.Strategies for Change:Logical Incrementalism[M].Homewood Illinois:Irwin.1980.
  • 6Herriott S R,Levinthal D,March J G.Learning from experience in organizations[J].American Economic Review,1985,75(2):298-302.
  • 7Kolb D A.Experiential Learning:Experience as the Source of Learning and Development[M].Englewood Cliffs,New Jersey:Prentice Hall,1984.
  • 8Davenport T H,Harris J G,David D W,et al.Data to knowledge to results:Building an analytic capability[J].California Management Review,2001,43(2):117-138.
  • 9Yelle L E.The learning curve:Historical review and comprehensive survey[J].Decision Sciences,1979,10(2):302-328.
  • 10Zimmerman M B.Learning effects and the commercialization of new energy technologies:The case of nuclear power[J].Bell Journal of Economics,1982,13(2):297-310.

二级参考文献89

共引文献135

同被引文献456

引证文献15

二级引证文献317

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部