摘要
论文质量、期刊质量与期刊影响力的关系是十分复杂的,它们是一种交互作用的关系。但是,在学术界、期刊界,人们对论文质量的判定、对期刊质量的评价却往往带有简单化、片面化的倾向,即把期刊影响因子等同于期刊影响力,把期刊影响力等同于期刊学术质量,把期刊影响力等同于论文学术质量。事实上,有关期刊管理部门推行的现行期刊评价体系,以及有关高校、科研单位采用的以刊评文的做法,既有其合理的一面,也有其不合理的一面。面对现行的评价体制,不管是期刊还是文献计量机构,不管是学者还是科研管理部门,多少都有些无奈和尴尬。如何构建和完善定性与定量相结合的、公正而又公平、科学而又合理的学术评价体制,使人文社会科学的研究者、传播者、管理者、评价者各归其位、各司其责,使人文社会科学走上良性循环的轨道,仍然是摆在人文社会科学工作者和管理者面前的一道难题。
Quality of papers and quality and influence of journals are complexly and interactively related.However,people in academic and periodical worlds are usually simple and partial in judgment of quality of papers and assessment of quality of journals.In other words,they usually equal the influential elements to influence of journals,influence of journals to their academic quality and quality of papers.As a result,either journals or document measurement institutions,either scholars or scientific research administrators,are equally helpless and awkward in face of the current assessment system.Therefore,one of the difficult problems facing humanistic and social science workers and administrators is to develop and complete a just and fair and scientific and reasonable system of academic assessment with combination of quantitative assessment with qualitative assessment so that researchers,disseminators,administrators and assessors of humanities and social sciences will find themselves in place and take their respective responsibility and that humanities and social sciences will work in a virtuous circle.
出处
《陕西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第5期64-69,共6页
Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
论文质量
期刊质量
期刊影响力
期刊评价
quality of papers
quality of journals
influence of journals
assessment of journals
