摘要
目的:观察综合干预对首发精神分裂症患者康复的影响。方法:116例首发精神分裂症患者随机分为两组,每组58例,观察组在常规用药的基础上采取综合干预,对照组仅采用一般情况介绍,比较干预前后PANSS、BPRS、GAS、SI和SDSS变化。结果:两组干预后PANSS阳性症状分、阴性症状分、病理症状分和总分均较干预前明显下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组干预后PANSS阳性症状分、阴性症状分、病理症状分和总分明显低于同期对照组评分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组干预后BPRS、SI和SDSS均较干预前明显下降,GAS明显升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组干预后BPRS、GAS、SI和SDSS明显优于同期对照组评分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对首发精神分裂症患者进行综合干预,可以改善患者的社会功能,有利于患者的精神康复,防止疾病复发。
Objective：To observe the affection of comprehensive intervention on the rehabilitation with first-episode schizophrenia patients. Methods：116 cases of first-episode schizophrenia patients were randomly classified into two groups, observation group with 58 cases were treated with comprehensive intervention at the basis of normal therapy and control group with 58 cases were only introduced the normal thing. The scores of PANSS, BPRS, GAS, SI and SDSS between pre-intervention and post- intervention were compared. Results：The positive symptoms score, negative symptoms score, patho-symptoms score and total score in two groups after intervention were significantly lower than those before intervention （P〈0.05）. The positive symptoms score, negative symptoms score, patho-symptoms score and total score in observation group after intervention were significantly lower than those in control group （P〈0.05 ）. Compared with preintervention, the scores of BPRS, SI and SDSS in two groups after intervention were significantly decreased （P〈0.05）, the score of GAS was significantly increased （P〈0.05）. The scores of BPRS, GAS, SI and SDSS in observation group after intervention were significantly bettter than those in control group （P〈0.05）. Conclusion：comprehensive intervention on with first-episode schizophrenia patients can improve their society function and profit in psychiatric rehabilitation and prevent disesse recurrence.
出处
《亚太传统医药》
2010年第11期62-64,共3页
Asia-Pacific Traditional Medicine
关键词
综合干预
首发精神分裂症
康复
Comprehensive Intervention
First-episode Schizophrenia
Rehabilitation
