重建教研室:教学组织变革视野下的高校教学质量建设策略被引量：71

To Reconstruct the Teaching and Research Division:University Teaching Quality Improvement Tactics in the Perspective of Teaching Organization Change

原文传递

导出

摘要 "教研室"是现代西方大学之外的高校组织模式的创新。教研室既是一种教学组织,也是一种研究组织和教师组织,对于提高教学质量、专门人才培养目标具有重要的意义,但在20世纪90年代我国高等教育系统的改造中被取消或其作用被弱化。提升高等教育质量,要求我们重建教研室以促进高校的教学从个体走向合作。高校的教研室应当建设成为组织和协调教学的平台,讨论和研究教学的中心,增进教师交流和促进教师发展的"加油站"。 The teaching and research division was the organization creation beyond the modern west university.The teaching and research division was not only a teaching organization,but also a research organization and a faculty organization,which played the important role in improving teaching quality and realizing the talent cultivation object.But the teaching and research division was shut down or weakened during the reform of higher education system in the 1990s.In order to improve teaching quality,to reconstruct the teaching and research division can promote university teaching from individuality to cooperation.The teaching and research division should be reconstructed to be the platform to organize and coordinate teaching,to be the center to discuss and research teaching,and to be the gas station to enhance communication and promote development for faculty.

作者刘小强何齐宗

机构地区江西师范大学高等教育研究室江西师范大学教育学院

出处《高等教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第10期57-61,共5页 Journal of Higher Education

基金教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(09YJA880060) 江西省教育科学2008年规划项目(赣教规划办字规划[2008]4号)

关键词教研室教学组织变革高校教学 teaching and research division teaching organization change university teaching

分类号 G642.8 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献4

1约翰·范德格拉夫.学术权力[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,2001.23～24,54～57,118.
2德雷克·博克.回归大学之道[M].侯定凯,译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2008:35.
3上海市高等教育局研究室,等.中华人民共和国建国以来高等教育重要文献编选(上)[G].转引自胡建华.现代中国大学制度的原点:50年代初期的大学改革[M].南京:南京师范大学出版社,2001:252.
4王玉衡.试论大学教学学术运动[J].外国教育研究,2005,32(12):24-29. 被引量：111

二级参考文献14

1吴雪萍,刘辉.澳大利亚高等教育教学质量保障策略探究[J].比较教育研究,2004,25(9):71-75. 被引量：23
2Carolin Kreber, Teaching Excellence,Teaching Expertise,and the Scholarship of Teaching [J], Innovative Higher Education, 2002,27 (1).
3Mary Taylor Huber. Disciplines and the Development ofa Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the UnitedStates of America [EB/OL]. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/embedded_object.asp?id=17612&filename=Discuss001.
4Glassick,C, E,,Huber,M, T,,Maeroff, G, I,, Scholarship Assessed:Evaluation of the Professoriate[M]. San Francisco :Jossey-Bass, 1997.6-7,36,.
5R. Eugene Rice. Rethinking Scholarship and New Practice:A Central AAHE Priority[ EB/OL ]. http://www.aahe.org/specialreports/part4.htm, 2005-05-26.
6E.L.波伊尔.学术水平反思—教授工作的重点领域[A]..当代外国教育改革著名文献(美国卷·第三册)[C].北京:人民教育出版社,2004.9..
7Lee Shulman, From Minsk To Pinsk:Why A Scholarship of Teaching And Learning? [J], Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning(JoSoTL),2000,1(1) :48-53.
8Randy Bass. The Scholarship of Teaching:What's the Problem? [EB/OL]. http://www.doiiit.gmu.edu/Arclfives/feb98/rbass.htm, 2005-05-24.
9Richard M, Felder, The Scholarship of Teaching [J].Chem. Engr, Education,2000,34(2) : 144.
10Kathleen Mckinney. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning[J]. Teaching/Zeaming Matters,ASA's Newsletter forthe Section on Teaching and Learning in Sociology,2004,33(3).