期刊文献+

科学研究中的不端行为刍议 被引量:10

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 科研不端行为已经成为当前学术界的一个重要问题,并且日益受到社会的广泛关注。科研不端行为不仅影响到科研人员个人及其所在机构团体,还损害了科学共同体的声誉和利益,危害科学事业的长期健康发展。因此,对科研不端行为的治理也逐渐从科学共同体内部进入到科研管理的政策操作层面。治理科研不端行为从源头上首先需要解决科研不端行为的界定问题。从这方面最有经验的美国来看,科研不端行为在政策操作层面上的界定经历了较长时间的演变,显示了相关管理权限分配明确化和向可操作性方向发展的趋势。当前我国科技界和科研管理部门已经认识到了科研不端行为问题的严重性及其治理的紧迫性,但相关工作还处于起步的阶段。剖析科研管理中不端行为的界定问题对我国科研不端行为治理工作的开展有重要的意义。
作者 黄小茹
出处 《科学文化评论》 2010年第6期23-32,共10页 Science & Culture Review
基金 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所青年科研基金资助项目(O700441Q01) 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所所长科研基金项目(O801091J01)
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Buzzelli, D. 1993. The Definition of Misconduct in Science: A View from NSF. Science. 259(5095) : 584 - 648.
  • 2Kaiser, J. 1999. A Misconduct Definition That Finally Sticks? Science. 286(5439): 391 - 391.
  • 3Kaiser, J. 1996. HHS Is Still Looking for a Definition. Science. 272(5269): 1735.
  • 4默顿.《社会研究与社会政策》,林聚任等译,北京:三联书店2001年版.
  • 5Price, A. 1994. Definitions and Boundaries of Research Misconduct: Perspectives from a Federal Government Viewpoint. The Journal of Higher Education. 65(3): 286 - 297.
  • 6任洪波.美国和丹麦的科研诚信[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2007,22(3):62-64. 被引量:17
  • 7张立,王华平.学术不端行为的模型化研究[J].科学学研究,2007,25(1):32-37. 被引量:18
  • 8Office of Research Integrity. About ORI-History. http://ori.dhhs.gov/about/history.shtml.
  • 9Department of Health and Human Services, United States Public Health Service 1989. Responsibilities of Awardee and Applicant Institutions for Dealing with and Reporting Possible Misconduct in Science: Final Rule, 42 CFR Part 50, Subpart. Federal Register, 54(8 August), 32446-51.
  • 10Department of Health and Human Services, Commission on Research integrity 1995. Integrity and Misconduct in Research. Washington, DC: Health and Human Services. p 1735.

二级参考文献15

  • 1National Academy of Sciences.Responsible Science:Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process[R].Washington D C:National Academy of Science Press,1992.27.
  • 2Buzzelli D.The definition of misconduct in science:a view from NSF[J].Science,1993,(259):584-585,647-648.
  • 3Department of Health and Human Services,United States Public Health Service.Responsibilities of Awardee and Applicant Institutions for Dealing with and Reporting Possible Misconduct in Science:Final Rule,42CFR Part 50,Subpart A[Z].Federal Register,54(8August 1989),32446-51.
  • 4Integrity and Misconduct in Research:Report of the Commission on Research Integrity[R].Washington,DC:US Dept of Health and Human Services,1995.USGPO 1996-746-425.
  • 5Office of Science and Technology Policy.Executive office of the President;Federal Policy on Research Misconduct;Preamble for Research Misconduct Policy:Notification of Final Policy[Z].Federal Register,65 (6December 2000),76260-64.
  • 6Zuckerman H.Deviant Behavior and Social Control in Science[A].E.A.Sagarin.Deviance and Social Change[C].Beverly Hills,Calif.:Sage,1977.87-137.
  • 7Babbage C.Reflections on the Decline of Science in England and or Some of its Causes[M].New York:Scholarly,1976.177-182.
  • 8Ben-David J.Organization,Social Control and Cognitive Change in Science[A].Ben-David J,Clark T.Culture and its Creators:Essays in Honor of Edward Shils[C].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1977.258.
  • 9Scull A.Deviance and Social Control[A].N.Smelser.Handbook of Sociology[C].Beverly Hills,Calif.:Sage.1988.667-93.
  • 10Fox M F.Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes[J].Journal of Higher Education,1994,65(3):298-309.

共引文献36

同被引文献100

引证文献10

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部