期刊文献+

遗忘型轻度认知损害患者记忆错误的神经心理学分析

Neuropsychological study of false memory in patients with amnesia mild cognitive impairment
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨遗忘型轻度认知损害(aMCI)患者记忆错误的认知神经心理学特征,了解aMCI患者记忆错误的神经心理学机制.方法 采用图片诱发情景记忆的记忆错误和知道感判断(feeling-of-knowing,FOK)的神经心理学测试方法,分别对25例来自2009年10月至2010年5月期间在安徽医科大学第一附属医院就诊的aMCI患者以及年龄、教育程度相匹配25名健康老年人进行测试.结果 与健康对照组相比,aMCI组故事编码和回忆阶段的记忆错误率(26%±7%)、问卷阶段的记忆错误发生率(28%±12%)和FOK-EM的正确判断/ 错误再认成绩(即高估)(41%±10%)均较高,差异有统计学意义(分别为t=14.437、7.597、4.207,P<0.05),且故事编码和回忆阶段的记忆错误率、问卷阶段的记忆错误发生率与FOK-EM的正确判断/错误再认成绩均呈正相关(分别为r=0.563、0.705,P<0.01). 结论 aMCI组的图片诱发的记忆错误较健康对照组高,aMCI患者记忆错误的产生可能与其记忆监测障碍(高估)有关. Objective To explore the profile of false memory in aMCI ( amnesia mild cognitive impairment) and to elucidate the neuropsychological mechanism of false memory. Methods False memory provoked by pictures and feeling-of-knowing (FOK) test in episodic memory (EM) were conducted in 25 aMCI patients at our hospital from October 2009 to May 2010. And 25 age and education level-matched healthy patients were recruited into the healthy control (HC) group. Results As compared with HC group,the rate of false memory was higher in the aMCI group. The rate of false memory in recall stage was 26% ±7% and that of questionnaire stage 28% ± 12%. And the difference between two group was significant (t = 14. 437, 7. 597, P 〈0. 05). The FOK-EM of correct judgment and false recognition in the aMCI group (41% ± 10% ) was higher than the HC group. And the difference was significant (t =4. 207, P 〈0. 05).The rates of false memory in recall and questionnaire stages were positively correlated with FOK-EM in aMCI group(r = 0. 563, 0. 705, P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusion The aMCI patients tend to have more false memory provoked by pictures. The deficit of memory monitoring in aMCI may be the foundation of false memory.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期155-159,共5页 National Medical Journal of China
基金 国家十一五科技支撑计划 (2006BAI02B01) 国家重点基础研究发展计划"973"项目子课题(2005CB522800) 国家自然科学基金 (30870766,30670706)
关键词 遗忘 认知障碍 记忆 神经心理学测验 Amnesia Cognition disorders Memory Neuropsychological tests
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Watanabe T,Shiino A,AKiguchi I.Absolute quantification in proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy is useful to differentiate amnesic mild cognitive impairment from Alzheimer's disease and healthy aging.Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord,2010,30:71-77.
  • 2Hildebrandt H,Haldenwanger A,Eling P.False recognition helps to distinguish patients with Alzheimer's disease and amnestic MCI from patients with other kinds of dementia.Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord,2009,28:159-167.
  • 3Ciaramelli E,Ghetti S,Frattarelli M,et al.When true memory availability promotes false memory:evidence from confabulating patients.Neuropsychologia,2006,44:1866-1877.
  • 4程怀东,汪凯,龚亮,尹长林,孟玉.遗忘型轻度认知损害患者的前瞻性记忆障碍[J].中华神经科杂志,2010,43(3):174-177. 被引量:6
  • 5Schnider A,Ptsk R.Spontaneous confabulators fail to suppress currently irrelevant memory traces.Nat Neurosci,1999,2:677-681.
  • 6Pannu JK,Kaszniak AW.Metamemory experiments in neurological populations:a review.Neuropsychol Rev,2005,15:105-130.
  • 7吴小三,程怀东,汪凯.轻度认知功能障碍的记忆监测[J].中华医学杂志,2009,89(15):1037-1040. 被引量:9
  • 8Petersen RC,Smith GE,Waring SC,et al.Mild cognitive impairment:clinical characterization and outcome.Arch Neurol,1999,56:303 -308.
  • 9Cooper JM,Shanks MF,Venneri A.Provoked confabulations in Alzheimer's disease.Neuropsychologia,2006,44:1697-1707.
  • 10Souchay C,Isingrini M,Gil R.Metsmemory monitoring and Parkinson's disease.J Clin Exp Neuropsychol,2006,28:618-630.

二级参考文献53

  • 1程怀东,汪凯,孟玉,靳胜春.老年人前瞻性记忆损害的研究[J].中华神经科杂志,2006,39(9):600-603. 被引量:14
  • 2程怀东,汪凯,牛朝诗,傅先明,席春华,孟玉.前额叶损伤患者基于事件和基于时间的前瞻性记忆损害[J].中华神经科杂志,2006,39(12):818-821. 被引量:25
  • 3McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, et al. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer' s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer' s Disease. Neurology, 1984, 34 : 939-944.
  • 4Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, et al. Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer' s disease: revising the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. Lancet Neurol, 2007, 6: 734-746.
  • 5Vanna AR, Snowden JS, Lloyd J J, et al. Evaluation of the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria in the differentiation of Alzheimer' s disease and frontotemporal dementia. J Neural Neumsurg Psychiatry, 1999, 66: 184-188.
  • 6Kral VA. Senescent forgetfulness: benign and malignant. Can Med Assoc J, 1962, 86: 257-260.
  • 7Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol, 1999, 56: 303-308.
  • 8Petersen RC, Morris JC. Mild cognitive impairment as a clinical entity and treatment target. Arch Neurol, 2005, 62: 1160-1163.
  • 9Visser PJ, Scheltens P, Verhey FR. Do MCI criteria in drug trials accurately identify subjects with predementia Alzheimer' s disease? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2005, 76: 1348-1354.
  • 10Galton CJ, Patterson K, Xuereb JH, et al. Atypical and typical presentations of Alzheimer ' s disease : a clinical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging and pathological study of 13 cases. Brain, 2000, 123 Pt 3: 484-498.

共引文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部