期刊文献+

基于思维法则学的群决策方法及其应用 被引量:2

A Nomology-Based Group-Decision Making Methodology and Its Application
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对群决策中如何科学地收集、集成、分析决策者真实看法的问题,基于西方的思维法则学理论,提出了指示优先级的程式化方法。该方法蕴涵了东方管理中的均衡思想,广泛用于爱尔兰政府及企业的各种项目中。作为该方法的原创者和翻译者合作团队,我们在5年多的合作研究中,探索了有关的理论发展及其中文表述。本文介绍指示优先级的程式化方法的适用情景和应用步骤,与其他方法论进行了比较,给出了应用案例。在应用案例中,对陕西省的5个市县财政局进行了访谈和问卷调查,对西安市财政局的调查数据进行了识别、集成和分析,得到了决策方案及优先级次序。应用结果表明:指示优先级的程式化方法适用于中国情境下的多属性/多准则群决策,能够提供决策依据。 To solve the problems of collecting,synthesizing and analyzing decision-makers' real opinions in group-decision making,a Priority-Pointing Procedure was proposed on the basis of the Western Nomology.This methodology embodies the thinking of balance embedded in the Eastern Management and has been successfully applied to a variety of projects in the Irish government and Irish businesses.As a research team consisting of the founder of the Priority-Pointing Procedure and his Chinese collaborators who commit to introducing Nomology and the Priority-Pointing Procedure to Chinese readership,in more than five years collaborative research we have explored the latest theoretical developments and their expressions in Chinese.In this paper we present the methodology of the Priority-Pointing Procedure,the situations where this methodology applies to,and the application process of this methodology.Then,we make comparisons between this methodology and some other methodologies applied in group-decision making.We also give an application case.In the case we applied the Priority-Pointing Procedure to a project in Shaanxi Governmental Department of Fiscal Affairs.We undertook interviews and questionnaire surveys in five fiscal branches of Shaanxi Governmental Department of Fiscal Affairs.We synthesized and analyzed the data collected in the Xian branch,and got alternatives and their priority for decision making.The application shows that Priority-Pointing Procedure can be used in the group-decision making with multiple attributes and multiple criteria in the Chinese context,and useful alternatives and references can be derived.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期177-184,共8页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(09YJA630126) 教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"(NCET-08-0812) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70871096)
关键词 管理科学 群决策 优先级 思维法则学 management science group-decision making priority Nomology
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献116

共引文献103

同被引文献23

  • 1Fei-hu Hu,Jie Jiang,Le Liu,Lin-yan Sun,Ying-cheng Ji.A new multi-perspective framework for multi-attribute decision making[J].Expert Systems With Applications.2010(12)
  • 2Oscar Romero,Alberto Abelló.A framework for multidimensional design of data warehouses from ontologies[J].Data & Knowledge Engineering.2010(11)
  • 3Jose-Norberto Mazón,Jens Lechtenb?rger,Juan Trujillo.A survey on summarizability issues in multidimensional modeling[J].Data & Knowledge Engineering.2009(12)
  • 4Jiang-Jiang Wang,You-Yin Jing,Chun-Fa Zhang,Guo-Hua Shi,Xu-Tao Zhang.A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for trigeneration system[J].Energy Policy.2008(10)
  • 5Qimi Jiang,Chun-Hsien Chen.A multi-dimensional fuzzy decision support strategy[J].Decision Support Systems.2003(4)
  • 6Bur? ülengin,Füsun ülengin,ümit Güven?.A multidimensional approach to urban quality of life: The case of Istanbul[J].European Journal of Operational Research.2001(2)
  • 7Rita Almeida Ribeiro.Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: A review and new preference elicitation techniques[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems.1996(2)
  • 8Ralph L. Keeney.Value-focused thinking: Identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives[J].European Journal of Operational Research.1996(3)
  • 9王坚强,任世昶.基于期望值的灰色随机多准则决策方法[J].控制与决策,2009,24(1):39-43. 被引量:17
  • 10赵清,张珞平,陈宗团.生态城市指标体系研究--以厦门为例[J].海洋环境科学,2009,28(1):92-95. 被引量:14

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部