基于开放牛津期刊的开放获取引用优势分析被引量：16

Analysis on Open Access Citation Advantage Based on Oxford Open Journals

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要本文以"开放牛津"的93种混合型期刊为研究样本,对其2009年刊载的全部论文的被引频次进行统计分析,以验证关于开放获取引用优势(OACA)的三个假设:存在开放获取引用优势;不同学科的OACA不同;OACA与期刊影响因子有相关性。通过研究发现:开放牛津期刊存在OACA,开放牛津期刊中的OA论文与非OA论文相比有138.87%的引用优势;五个学科领域的开放牛津期刊的OACA存在差异(其中人文科学不存在OACA);开放获取引用优势与期刊影响因子之间具有显著的逆函数关系,即随着期刊影响因子的增长,开放获取引用优势呈下降趋势。 This study takes 12354 original research articles published on 93 Oxford Open journals in 2009 as a sample,and then carries out statistic analyses on the citation frequency that these articles have received by July 2010 to validate 3 hypotheses：（1） there is citation advantage for open access articles（OACA） published in Oxford Open journals over the non-OA ones;（2） OACA varies with disciplines;（3） higher-impact-factor Oxford Open journals maybe have weaker OACA over lower-impact-factor ones.We finally discovers that： 1） there exists OACA for open access articles,in this case which indicates 138.87% over non-OA ones;2） different disciplines have different OACAs,and Humanities journals of Oxford Open have even a negative OACA;3） Oxford Open journals with lower IFs have stronger OACAs than those with higher IFs,namely OACA would shrink along with the augment of journals＇ IFs.

作者刘锦宏徐丽芳方卿

机构地区武汉理工大学文法学院武汉大学信息管理学院

出处《图书情报知识》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期64-72,共9页 Documentation,Information & Knowledge

基金 2009年度国家社科基金项目"开放获取学术资源分布与集成研究"(09CTQ024) "中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助"研究项目成果之一

关键词引用优势开放获取被引频次 Citation advantage Open access Cited frequency

分类号 G350 [文化科学—情报学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献23

1Asefeh Asemi. A Citation Analysis of Iranian Journals to Open Access (OA) Articles and Journals. Scientometrics, 2010, 82 (3): 487-494.
2Lansingh, V. C. , & Carter, M. J. Does Open Access in Ophthalmology Affect How Articles are Subsequently Cited in research? Ophthalmology, 2009,116 ( 8 ), 1425-1431.
3Michael J. Kurtz. Restrictive Access Policies Cut Readership of Electronic Research Journal Articles by a Factor of Two. [2010- 07-20], http: //opcit. eprints, org/feb19oa/kurtz, pdf.
4Gaule, P., & Maystre, N.. Getting Cited: does Open Access Help? (No. CEMI-Working Paper-2008-007): Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne. [2008-07-28]. http: //www. aeaweb. org /aea /conference /program /retrieve. php? pdfid= 147.
5Bo-Christer Bjork, Patrik Welling, etc.. Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009. PIoS ONE, 2010, 5(6) : e11237, doi: 10. 1371 /journal. pone. 0011273.
6Yasar Tonta, Yurdagul unal, Umut AI. The Research Impact of Open Access Journal Articles. Proceedings ELPUB2007 Conference on Electronic Publishing. Vienna, Austria, 2007.
7Michael J. Kurtz, Edwin A. Henneken. Open Access Does not Increase Citations for Research Articles from The Astrophysical Journal. [ 2010-07-27 ]. http: //arxiv. org/ttp/arxiv/papers/ 0709/0709. 0896. pdf.
8Gunther Eysenbach. Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles. PLoS Biology, 2006,4(5): 1-7.
9Weihong Cheng, Shengli Ren. Evolution of Open Access Publishing in Chinese Scientific Journals. Learned Publishing, 2008, 21(2): 140-152.
10Michael Norris, Charles Oppenheim, Fytton Rowland. The Citation Advantage of Open-Access Articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008,59( 12 ) : 1963-1972.