摘要
目的对比研究电梅花针治疗儿童屈光不正性和屈光参差性弱视临床效果。方法 选择未曾接受过任何治疗的屈光不正性和屈光参差性弱视初诊儿童共60例(107眼),在验光配镜的基础上,随机分为两组,分别行电梅花针治疗(治疗组30例54眼)和物理综合疗法治疗(对照组30例53眼),观察治疗1个月后临床疗效。结果 治疗1个月后治疗组与对照组的总有效率分别为79.6%(43/54)和58.5%(31/53)。两组病例疗效经统计学处理差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),治疗组优于对照组。结论 电梅花针治疗儿童弱视,起效快,依从性好,短期疗效确切,无副作用。
Objective To comparatively study the clinical effect of electrical plum-blossom needle on ametropic amblyopia and anisometropic amblyopia.Methods Sixty children（107 eyes） with ametropic amblyopia or anisometropic amblyopia were randomly assigned to two groups at their first visit on the basis of optometry.They had never received any treatment before.Patients in one group were treated with electrical plum-blossom needle（as the treatment group） and those in the other group were treated with physical comprehensive therapy（as the control group）.The 1-month clinical effect was observed.Results The 1-month total effective rate was 79.6%（43/54） in the treatment group and 58.5%（31/53） in the control group.Statistical significance was shown in clinical effect after statistical management.The electrical plum-blossom needle showed better effect than the combprehensive therapy.Conclusion The electrical plum-blossom needle for treatment of amblyopia in children could initiate faster with good compliance.Its short-term effect was definite with no side effect.
出处
《中国中西医结合杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2011年第3期342-345,共4页
Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
关键词
电梅花针
综合疗法
弱视
electrical plum-blossom needle
comprehensive therapy
amblyopia
