期刊文献+

腰椎融合联合Coflex动态固定手术治疗腰椎退行性疾病 被引量:13

Spinal fusion combined with dynamic interspinous fixation with Coflex system for lumbar degenerative disease
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:总结腰椎后路椎间融合术联合Coflex动态固定术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效。方法:对2008年3月至2010年3月应用腰椎后路椎间融合术联合Coflex动态固定治疗的18例腰椎退行性疾病患者(均为双节段)的临床资料进行回顾性总结分析。男11例,女7例;年龄41~62岁,平均50.2岁。分析内容包括:ODI指数、腰痛和下肢痛的VAS评分,并通过腰椎动力位X线观察活动度(ROM)、椎间隙高度(DHI)的变化情况。结果:所有患者获得随访,时间6~30个月,平均12个月。在末次随访时,腰痛VAS评分、下肢痛VAS评分及ODI指数均较术前明显改善(P<0.001)。腰痛VAS评分术前(7.20±0.90)分,末次随访(1.50±0.90)分;下肢痛VAS评分术前(5.20±0.90)分,末次随访(1.10±0.80)分。ODI指数术前(52.50±5.90)%,末次随访(15.90±5.80)%。Coflex置入节段的DHI术前0.23±0.05,术后0.35±0.06,末次随访0.33±0.04,椎间隙高度未见明显丢失。Coflex置入节段的ROM术前(8.90±1.80)°,术后降至(8.30±1.90)°,末次随访(8.10±1.80)°,与术前差异无统计学意义(P=0.19),Coflex置入节段活动度未见明显改变。L2-S1ROM术前为(20.20±5.60)°,术后(14.40±5.70)°,末次随访(15.50±5.20)°,与术前比较有统计学差异(P=0.01)。结论:腰椎后路椎间融合术联合Coflex动态固定治疗双节段腰椎退变性疾病能取得满意的中短期临床疗效,但没有充分证据证明这项技术优于多节段融合术。手术适应证的合理选择十分重要。 Objective:To summarize the effect of the implantation of Coflex interspious stabilization device combined with spinal fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease.Methods:From March 2008 to March 2010,18 patients with two levels lumbar degenerative disease were treated with spinal fusion and dynamic interspinous fixation with Coflex system.There were 11 males and 7 females.The average age was 50.2 years(range 41 to 62 years).The VAS and the Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) were used to assess clinical symptoms preoperatively and postoperatively.All patients underwent flexion/extension radiographs examinations before surgery and at last follow-up.Range of motion(ROM) and disc height index(DHI) were recorded.Results:All patients were followed up for 12 months averagely(range 6-30 months).At final follow-up,leg VAS,back VAS and ODI functional score were significant improved than those of preoperation [back VAS:1.50±0.90 vs 7.20±0.90;leg VAS:1.10±0.80 vs 5.20±0.90;ODI functional score:(15.90±5.80)% vs(52.50±5.90)%].The DHI increased from 0.23±0.05 preoperatively to 0.35±0.06 postoperatively and to 0.33±0.04 at final follow-up,the height of intervertebral space were not found significant loss.The ROM at the Coflex stabilized levels on the X-ray views was(8.90±1.80)° preoperatively,(8.30±1.90)° postoperatively,and(8.10±1.80)° at final follow-up.There was no significant difference between final follow-up and preoperative(P=0.19).The ROM of the lumbar spine(L2-S1) was(20.20±5.60)° preoperatively,(14.40±5.70)° postoperatively,and(15.50±5.20)° at final follow-up.There was significant reduction of the L2-S1 ROM at final follow-up(P=0.01).Conclusion:Posterior interspinous stabilization with Coflex system combined with spinal fusion can obtain satisfactory outcomes for patients with two levels lumbar degenerative disease in the short follow-up duration.Nevertheless,no overwhelming evidence suggested that the system is better than traditional fusion at present.The selection of surgical indication is important for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease.
出处 《中国骨伤》 CAS 2011年第4期277-281,共5页 China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
基金 上海市科委医学重点项目(编号:09411952900)~~
关键词 腰椎 退行性疾病 脊柱融合术 脊柱非融合术 动态固定 Lumbar vertebrae Degenerative disease Spinal fusion Spinal non-fusion Dynamic fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Etebar S,Cahill DW.Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability[J].J Neurosurg,1999,90(2 Suppl):163-169.
  • 2Korovessis P,Papazisis Z,Koureas G,et al.Rigid,semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis; correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results[J].Spine,2004,29(7):735-742.
  • 3Chiselli C.Wang JC,Bhatia NN,et al.Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spinet[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2004,86(7):1497-1503.
  • 4Dobbs MB,Lenke LG,Kim YJ.et al.Anterior/Posterior spinal instrumentation versus posterior instrumentation alone for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliotic curves more than 90 degrees[J].Spine,2006,31(20):2386-2391.
  • 5Cheh C.Bridwell KH.Lenke LC,et al.Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation:a minimum 5-year follow-up[JJ.Spine,2007,32(20):2253-2257.
  • 6陈一衡,徐丁,徐华梓,池永龙,王向阳,黄其杉.Coflex棘突间动力内固定装置治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄[J].中国骨伤,2009,22(12):902-905. 被引量:17
  • 7Bono CM,Vaccaro AR.Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2007,20(3):255-261.
  • 8Fairbank JC,Pynsent PB.The Oswestry Disability Index[J].Spine,2000,25 (22):2940-2952.
  • 9Cheung KM,Zhang YC,Lu DS,et al.Reduction of disc space distraction after anterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous iliac crest graft[J].Spine,2003,28(13):1385-1389.
  • 10Bono CM,Lee CK.Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years:influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome[J].Spine,2004,29 (4):455-463.

二级参考文献21

  • 1连平,孙荣华,杨维权,王维民,刘大雄,张连生,杨广才,贾连顺,戴力杨,徐印坎,张永涛.腰椎椎管与硬膜囊横截面积及其动态变化的实验研究[J].中华外科杂志,1995,33(3):151-154. 被引量:17
  • 2McKenna PJ,Freeman BJ,Mulholland RC,et al. A prospective, randomised controlled trial of femoral ring allograft versus a titanium cage in circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with minimum 2- year clinical results. Eur Spine J, 2005,14 (8) :727-737.
  • 3Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Assessment of surgical treatment of low back pain. Jpn Orthop Assoc, 1984,58 : 1183-1187.
  • 4Kong DS, Kim ES, Eoh W. One-year outcome evaluation after interspinous implantation for degenerative spinal stenosis with segmental instability. J Korean Med Sci, 2007,22 (2) : 330-335.
  • 5Gupta S, Soellinger M, Boesiger P, et al. Three-dimensional computational modeling of subject-specific cerebrospinal fluid flow in the subarachnoid space. J Biomech Eng, 2009,131 (2) : 021010.
  • 6Richards JC, Majumdar S,Lindsey DP,et al. The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication. Spine, 2005,30 (7): 744-749.
  • 7Wilke HJ, Drumm J, Haussler K, et al. Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure. Eur Spine J, 2008, 17 (8) : 1049-1056.
  • 8Bono CM ,Vaecaro AR. Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2007,20 (3) : 255-261.
  • 9Mulholland RC,Sengupta DK. Rationale,principles and experimental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilization. Eur Spine J, 2002,11 (Suppl 2) :S198-205.
  • 10Aota Y, Kumano K, Hirabayashi S. Postfusion instability at the adjacent segments afier rigid pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders[J]. J Spinal Disord, 1995,8(6): 464-.473.

共引文献21

同被引文献111

引证文献13

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部