期刊文献+

糖尿病患者焦虑和抑郁分析及其干预 被引量:1

Analysis of anxiety and depression in patients with diabetes mellitus and related intervention
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨糖尿病患者焦虑、抑郁的发病率,并观察综合干预的效果。方法采用Zung焦虑自评量表(SAS)及抑郁自评量表(SDS)对69例住院糖尿病患者进行问卷调查,然后进行为期8周的药物和心理综合干预,再进行复查。结果糖尿病患者存在不同程度的抑郁及焦虑,经8周综合干预后,SAS及SDS评分分别由(47.35±8.72)分(、52.37±9.34)分降为(35.56±7.28)分(、42.14±7.77)分,干预前后比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),焦虑、抑郁发生率分别由49.3%4、3.5%降为21.7%、17.4%,干预前后比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论糖尿病患者焦虑及抑郁发生率较高,药物及心理综合干预可有效降低其发生率。 Objective To investigate the incidence of anxiety and depression in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and to observe effects of comprehensive intervention. Methods Questionnaire was conducted on 69 DM patients by using Zung Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS). A comprehensive drug (benzodiazepines) and psychological intervention was made for 8 weeks and then, all the patients were reexamined following treatment. Results Patients with DM had symptoms of anxiety and depression to various degrees. Following 8 weeks of comprehensive intervention, SAS and SDS scores decreased significantly (47.35 ± 8.72 versus 35.56 ±7.28, 52.37±9.34 versus 42.14 ± 7.77) with statistical significance (P 〈 0.01 ). The incidence of anxiety and depression decreased markedly (49.3% versus 21.7%, 43.5% versus 17.4% ) with statistical significance (P 〈0.01 ). Conclusion Patients with DM had higher incidence of anxiety and depression, comprehensive drug and psychological intervention could effectively decrease their incidence.
作者 胡淑霞
出处 《海军医学杂志》 2011年第3期166-168,共3页 Journal of Navy Medicine
关键词 糖尿病 焦虑 抑郁 心理干预 Diabetes mellitus Anxiety Depression Psychological intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献29

  • 1张明圆.精神科评定量表手册[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1993.122-137.
  • 2[1]唐其桂,张永珍,刘昌惠.临床心脏学[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2000.239-248.
  • 3[2]Garrol BT, Kathol RG, Noyes R J, et al. Screening for depression and anxiety in cancer patients using the hospital anxiety and depression scale [J]. Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 1993, 15 (1): 69.
  • 4[5]Labbrozzi D, Carinci F, Nicolucci A, et al. Psychological characteristics of patients with infarction: results of the GISSI2. Italian Group for the study of survival in myocardial infarction (GISSI) [J]. G Ital Cardiol, 1996, 26: 85-106.
  • 5Inui A, Kitaoka H, Majima M, et al. Effect of the Kobe earthquake on stress and glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med, 1998,158:274-278.
  • 6Sugimori H, Miyakawa M, Yoshida K, et al. Health risk assessment for diabetes mellitus based on longitudinal analysis of MHTS database. J Med Syst, 1998,22:27-32.
  • 7Peyrot M, Rubin RR. Levels and risks of depression and anxiety symptomatology among diabetic adults. Diabetes Care, 1997,20:585-590.
  • 8Black SA. Increased health burden associated with comorbid depression in older diabetic Mexican Americans. Diabetes Care,1999,22 : 56-64.
  • 9van der Dose FE, de Neeling JN, Snoek FJ, et al. Randomized study of two different target levels of glycemic control within the acceptable range in type Ⅱ diabetes. Diabetes Care, 1998,21:2085-2093.
  • 10Eaton WW, Armenian H, Gallo J, et al. Depression and risk for onset of type Ⅱ diabetes. Diabetes Care,1996,19:1097-1102.

共引文献225

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部