摘要
目的通过比较两种不同灌肠法在胃肠手术患者的应用,选择更合适、经济、耐受性好的灌肠方法。方法选择胃肠道手术后腹胀或术后3～4d不能排气的患者100例,随机分为观察组与对照组,观察组用改良灌肠法,对照组采用传统的灌肠法,比较两组灌肠法的疗效。结果观察组灌肠法减少胃肠手术后腹胀程度明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论观察组方案优于对照组方案,对预防及治疗术后腹胀,促进胃肠功能恢复,效果明显,值得推广改良灌肠法。
Objective Comparing two different methods enema application in patients after abdominal surgery,choose a more appropriate economic,tolerance and good enema.Methods Select abdominal distention after gastrointestinal surgery or 3 to 4 days after 100 patients can not exhaust.Randomly divided into two groups with the control group,with the modified enema study group and control group using the traditional enema,to compare the efficacy of the two groups enema.Results Enema of the observation group was better than the control group in reduction postoperative abdominal distention gastrointestinal,the difference was statistically significant.Conclusion Observation group is better than the control group,Obvious effect on the prevention and treatment of postoperative abdominal distention,and promote recovery of gastrointestinal function.It is worth promoting improve enema.
出处
《中外医学研究》
2011年第23期68-69,共2页
CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
关键词
胃肠术后
灌肠法
护理
Gastrointestinal surgery
Enema
Nursing
