摘要
目的:比较派丽奥和牙康棒对轻、重度慢性牙周炎的临床疗效。方法:选择轻、重度慢性牙周炎病人59人,共284个患牙,其中轻度牙周炎126个,重度牙周炎158个,经常规根面平整术等牙周基础治疗后,随机分为2组,分别用派丽奥和牙康棒进行治疗,每周1次共4次,记录治疗4周、8周后GI(牙龈指数)、BI(出血指数)、PD(牙周袋深度)并进行统计学分析。结果:两组药物治疗轻、重度慢性牙周炎4周和8周后,GI、BI、PD等各项指标均较基线有明显好转,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。派丽奥对重度慢性牙周炎的疗效优于牙康棒。结论:派丽奥和牙康棒局部应用均具有效改善牙周炎的临床各项指标,派丽奥对重度慢性牙周炎效果更好。
AIM： To compare the effect of PERIO and Yakang-stick on the treatment of slight and ad-vanced periodontitis. METHODS： Two hundred and eighty-four teeth from 59 patients （126 teeth with slight periodontitis and 158 teeth with advanced periodontitis） were treated with PERIO or with Yakang-stick after routine root planning. The clinical indexes of gingival index （GI）, bleeding index （BI） and probing depth （PD） were recorded and analyzed statistically. RESULTS： Campared with baseline values, GI, BI and PD in both groups were signigicantly improved after 4 weeks treatment （ P 〈 0.05 ）. The effect of PERIO on advanced periodontitis was better than that of Yakang-stick. CONCLUSION： Both PERIO and Yakang-stick showed satisfactory effect when used for the treatment of periodontitis. PERIO was better than Yakang-stick when used on patients with advanced periodontitis.
出处
《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》
CAS
北大核心
2011年第8期472-474,共3页
Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
关键词
慢性牙周炎
药物治疗
派丽奥
牙康棒
chronic periodontitis
drug treatment
PERIO
Yakang-stick
