摘要
观察六十年来辛亥革命研究的学术变迁,"研究假设"和"研究取径"是两个兼顾理论与实践的最有效的分析概念。因为在不同时期的研究假设和核心概念之下,均有特定的研究对象、学术问题、视角方法与之相辅相成,形成具有某种规范意义的研究模型。六十年来,中国大陆的辛亥革命研究经历了"革命史—事件史"、"现代化史—社会变迁史"、"后现代视野—社会文化研究"三种模型的变迁和兴替。"革命史—事件史"模型的典范期是20世纪50—60年代,80年代为其发展期。"现代化史—社会变迁史"模型形成于80年代,在90年代深入发展。"后现代视野—社会文化研究"模型则在21世纪以来的辛亥革命研究中崭露头角。时至今日,方法视角多样、边界模糊的辛亥革命研究日益成为主潮。辛亥革命研究的学术变迁,是六十年来时代变迁的反映;辛亥革命研究的发展和走向,也必定存在于其对新的"时代问题"的关怀之中。
For the past 60 years, the study of China＇ s 1911 Revolution has gone through different models. Research hypotheses and approaches are two efficient analytical ＂keywords＂ which enable us to see the changes of dominant models clearly, and what problems, targets and perspectives each model advocates to form its own standard academic framework. Three dominant research models are generalized in this paper： the revolutionary and political event model, the modernization and social changes model, the post-modernist cultural study model. The first model of revolutionary narrative was formed in the 1950s and 1960s, and fully developed in the 1980s. Model two of modernization and social changes appeared in the 1980s and was widely carried out in the 1990s. Model three of post-modernist cultural study is the latest trend of the 21th century. Today, the study of China＇s 191l Revolution has gone far beyond the traditional perspective defining it as a great political event more and more diversified discourses are heard here, transforming this field into a trans-disciplinary platform. Different time brings different ideas and questions, and the academic transformation of the 1911 Revolution study can well prove the changes of China＇s cultural atmosphere.
出处
《学术月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第10期144-154,共11页
Academic Monthly
基金
2010年度浙江文化研究工程"纪念辛亥革命100周年"专项研究课题(10WHXH26)成果之一
关键词
辛亥革命研究
学术变迁
六十年
研究假设
研究取径
the study of China＇s 1911 Revolution, academic transformation, hypotheses, approaches
