期刊文献+

权重信息未知情况下的多属性群决策方法及其拓展 被引量:25

A Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making with Complete Unknown Weight Information and Its Extension
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文针对群决策中专家权重及指标权重难以确定的问题,提出一种在权重信息完全未知情况下的基于证据距离和模糊熵权变换的多属性群决策方法,其核心在于如何仅通过决策矩阵客观地确定决策者权重及指标权重。通过信息熵和证据距离确定专家权重,并利用模糊变换原理,将专家权重向量与指标熵权矩阵合成,得到统一的群体决策指标权重;最后使用线性加权法集成所有专家对备选方案的评价信息,得到整个方案集的排序。实验结果及相关讨论表明,该方法概念清晰,计算量适中,具有较强的客观性,而且易于机器实现,是一种可行、有效的多属性群决策方法。最后将该方法推广到属性值由精确数、语言值、区间数、直觉模糊数等多种形式构成的混合型多属性群决策中。 In view of the hard problem that the weights of decision makers and criteria are usually vague and imprecise in group decision making process, we propose a linear method of multi-attribute group decision making with complete ignorance of weight information, with the emphasis on how to objectively determine the weights of decision makers and the weights of criteria only by decision matrices. We firstly introome of fuzzy transformation to obtain the united weights of criteria in group decision making. Finally a linear weighted method is utilized to aggregate individual opinions of decision makers for rating the importance of alternatives. Two numerical examples for supplier selection and some relevant discussion are given to examine the feasibility and validity of the presented approach, which is characterized by clear concept, mod- erate computational complexity, strong objective, and easy machine implementation. In the end we extend it to hybrid multiple attribute group decision making with attribute values in the various forms of precise numbers, linguistic terms, intervals, and intuitionistic fuzzy numbers.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期94-103,共10页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70972058) 教育部社科研究青年基金项目(10YJC630063)
关键词 多属性 群决策 权重 信息熵 证据距离 multiple attribute group decision making weights information entropy evidential distance
  • 相关文献

参考文献50

  • 1Hwang,C. L. , Lin, M.J.. Group Decision Making under Multiple Criteria[M]. New York: Spring-Verlag, 1987.
  • 2方卫国,周泓.逼近群体理想点的多目标群体决策算法[J].管理科学学报,1998,1(4):34-38. 被引量:32
  • 3廖貅武,李垣,董广茂.一种处理语言评价信息的多属性群决策方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(9):90-98. 被引量:40
  • 4Boran, F. E., Genc, S., Kurt, M., Akay, D.. A multi criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(8): 11363- 11368.
  • 5Ye, F. , Li, Y. N.. Group multi-attribute decision model to partner selection in the formation of virtual enterprise under incomplete information[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(5): 9350-9357.
  • 6Angiz, M. Z. , Emrouznejad, A. , Mustafa, A. , Komijan, A. R.. Selecting the most preferable alternatives in a group decision making problem using DEA[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(5).. 9599-9602.
  • 7Wang, Y. M. , Chin, K. S.. A new data envelopment analysis method for priority determination and group decision making in the analytic hierarchy process[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 195 (1) : 239-250.
  • 8Xu, Z. S.. A C-OWA operator based approach to decision making with interval fuzzy preference relation[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2006, 21 (12): 1289-1298.
  • 9陈华友,刘金培,王慧.一类连续区间数据的有序加权调和(C-OWH)平均算子及其应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2008,28(7):86-92. 被引量:31
  • 10徐泽水.基于语言标度中术语指标的多属性群决策法[J].系统工程学报,2005,20(1):84-88. 被引量:66

二级参考文献203

共引文献926

同被引文献292

引证文献25

二级引证文献222

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部