摘要
本文是对当前部分地方推行的,力图追求法院在"大调解"中占据"主导"地位的本土实践的反思,并试图通过论述证明:法院在现有的制度环境下很难真正地扮演起"大调解"中的主导角色。这与执政党对法院的定位、社会公众对解纷机构的选择倾向和司法的固有限度息息相关。法院的这种角色决定了其在追求"大调解"格局"主导地位"过程中所采用的各种策略。这些策略的采用虽然极大提升了法院解决疑难纠纷的能力,但却同时进一步限制了法院对"主导地位"的追求。二律悖反的事实说明准确定位才是法院在"大调解"中发挥更大作用的基础和关键。
There are many so-called local ＂court-leading＂ work systems,which mean courts are playing and should play a leading position in all mediation mechanisms,such as people＇s mediation,administrative mediation and judicial mediation,in the current local practices of the ＂Extensive Mediation System＂.This paper is a reflection of this kind of practices.The author tries to demonstrate the fact that it is arduous for China＇s courts to achieve the ＂leading role＂ in present institutional background because of the Party＇s arrangement,the public preference of dispute-resolving institutions and the judicial limitations.The tactics utilizing in the practices of the Extensive Mediation System by China＇s courts depend highly on the current position of China＇s courts.Through utilizing various kinds of tactics,China＇s courts can improve their own capability to resolve the ＂complicated disputes＂ on one side;however they also make the pursuit of ＂court-leading＂ more unlikely to succeed on the other side.This kind of paradox indicates that self-understanding is the key point and prerequisite for China＇s courts to play a more significant role in the ＂Extensive Mediation System＂.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第6期23-36,共14页
Law and Social Development
关键词
大调解
法院的地位
法院的策略
资源依赖
新制度主义
the Extensive Mediation System
the status of China＇s courts
the tactics of China＇s courts
resource dependency
new institutionalism
