期刊文献+

极重度听障儿童单元音共振峰测量及分析 被引量:1

The Measurement and Analysis of the Pure Vowel Formants Produced by Profoundly Hearing-impaired Children
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨3~6岁极重度听障儿童单元音共振峰的平均值与健听儿童的差异,为指导听障儿童的语言康复训练提供参考。方法使用语音工作站采样分析,让10名3~6岁的极重度听障儿童在自然舒适状态下发/a/、/o/、/e/,/i/、/u/、/u/6个元音,每个音持续3s以上,并截取各声样中的3s平稳段进行声学参数的检测和分析。同时,与同年龄段健听儿童的数据做对照。结果听障组6个单元音的3个共振峰与健听组相比较,所有元音的F1无显著性差异(P〉0.05);元音/o/~n/u/的F2无显著性差异(P〉0.05),其余各元音的F2有显著性差异(P〈0.05);所有元音的F3都有显著性差异(P〈0.05)。结论极重度听障儿童的单元音共振峰与健听儿童有差异,这可能是引起听障儿童发这些元音不清楚的原因之一。 Objective To study the potential differences in average pure vowel formants between profoundly hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing children and to provide guidance for speech rehabilitation training for hearing-impaired children. Methods The voice samples were obtained from ten profoundly hearing-impaired children of 3-6 years old as they pronounced /a/, /o/, /e/, /i/, /u/ and /0/ naturally with each sound lasting over 3 seconds. The 3 s stable stage was obtained from each sound sample for acoustic parameter analysis. These data were compared with those of normal-hearing children. Results The three formants of 6 vowels by the hearing-impaired children were compared with those of normal-hearing children and no significant difference was found in F1 of all the vowels(P〉0.05). No significant difference in F2 of/o/and /u/(P〉O.O5)was noted, but significant differences in that of other vowels(P〈0.05) observed.The significant differences were also observed in F3 of all the vowels (P〈0.05) between hearing-impaired and normal-hearing group (P〈0.05). Conclusion There are significant differences in pure vowel formants between hearing-impaired and normal-hearing children, which may be one of the reasons why profoundly hearing-impaired children can't pronounce the vowels clearly.
作者 于澜 王枫
出处 《中国听力语言康复科学杂志》 2011年第6期35-37,共3页 Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation
关键词 元音 共振峰 极重度听力损失 Vowel Formant Profound hearing impairment
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献29

  • 1文抑西,刘建华.应用计算机语音分析技术对腭裂语音元音音素的初步分析[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1994,12(3):175-179. 被引量:10
  • 2吴宗济.普通话语句中的声调变化[J].中国语文,1982,6:439-449.
  • 3吴宗济 林贸籼.实验语言学概要(第一版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1989.73-109.
  • 4Uchanski R M, Geers A E. Acoustic characteristics of the speech of young cochlear implant users: a comparison with normal-hearing age-mates. Ear Hear, 2003, 24(1 Suppl): 90S-105S.
  • 5Higgins M B, McCleary E A, Carney A E, et al. Longitudinal changes in children's speech and voice physiology after cochlear implantation. Ear Hear,2003,24: 48-70.
  • 6Huber J E, Stathopoulos E T, Curione G M, et al. Formants of children, women, and men: the effects of vocal intensity variation. J Acoust Soc Am,1999,106:1532-1542.
  • 7Svirsky M A, Tobey E A. Effect of different types of auditory stimulation on vowel formant frequencies in multichannel cochlear implant users.J Acoust Soc Am,1991,89:2895-2903.
  • 8Seifert E, Oswald M, Bruns U,et al. Changes of voice and articulation in children with cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol,2002,66:115-123.
  • 9Hamzavi J, Deutsch W,Baumgartner W D,et al.Cochlear implantation and auditory feedback.Wien Klin Wochenschr,2000 ,112 : 515-518.
  • 10Perrin E, Berger-Vachon C, Topouzkhain A, et al. Evaluation of cochlear implanted children's voices. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 1999,47:181-186.

共引文献32

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部