期刊文献+

Twin block式阻鼾器与Silensor阻鼾器初戴后患者耐受性的比较 被引量:1

Tolerance comparison of OSAS patients between Twin block appliance and Silensor appliance during initial seven days
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较Twin block式阻鼾器与Silensor阻鼾器初戴后患者耐受性的差异,以及对患者睡眠的影响。方法选择首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院口腔科应用Twin block式阻鼾器或Silensor阻鼾器治疗的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)患者87例,男56例,女31例;平均年龄51岁。发予记录表格,采用目测类比评分法(VAS)记录阻鼾器初戴后7d内患者疼痛不适的程度,并记录对睡眠的影响。从收回完成的71份表格中,分别选出佩戴Twin block式阻鼾器与Silensor阻鼾器治疗的患者各30例。结果阻鼾器初戴后7d内,佩戴Twin block式阻鼾器与Silensor阻鼾器患者的VAS评分及睡眠评分均逐渐下降,但两组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论 Twin block式阻鼾器与Silensor阻鼾器初戴后患者疼痛不适的程度及对睡眠的影响无显著差异,应根据患者自身特点有选择地戴用合适的矫正器。 Objective To compare the degree of tolerance of OSAS patients between Twin block appliance and Silensor appliance during initial seven days and to explore the interference on their sleep. Methods A total of 87 OSAS patients, including 56 males and 31 females, average aging 51 years, accepting orthodontic treatment, were surveyed with questionnaire to record the degree of discomfort as well as the interference on their sleep within the first 7 days after appliance placement. A total of 71 questionnaires was taken back and filled completely. Each 30 OSAS patients with Twin block appliance and Silensor appliance were selected in this study, and no re -bending was found in the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in tolerance and sleep status between the two groups during initial seven days after initial appliance placement (P 0.05). Conclusion The degrees of tolerance and interference on their sleep experienced by both the Twin block appliance and Silensor appliance during initial seven days are similar.
出处 《北京医学》 CAS 2011年第11期901-903,共3页 Beijing Medical Journal
关键词 TWIN block式阻鼾器 Silensor阻鼾器 耐受性 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征 Twin block appliance Silensor appliance Tolerance OSAS
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献46

共引文献42

同被引文献19

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部