期刊文献+

突发事件中的国家—社会关系 上海基层社区“抗非”考察 被引量:34

The State-Society Relations in a Crisis:An Investigation of the "Combat against SARS" by Local Communities in Shanghai
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 对中国城市基层治理的探讨,大多得出"强国家、弱社会"的结论,其议题亦无涉居民切身利益,无法为"强势国家"提供有力佐证。本研究以上海社区"抗非"动员为背景,观察突发事件中的国家—社会关系。调查发现,上海的"抗非"工作几乎都由国家主导,居民仅被动配合,自发参与度极其有限。在具体策略上,国家一方面透过主流媒体的调控,掌握"议题建构"渠道;另一方面则借助社区建设的配合,节制"社会参与"渠道,从而在因对突发事件的过程中,强化了国家的合法性和掌控力,构筑了"国强社弱"的制度格局。 Most of the studies on local governance in urban China conclude that the state has always been dominating the society.However,almost all of them are based on issues not directly related to the interests of the residents,therefore,unable to provide strong evidence for the existence of a dominating state.This study investigated the state-society relations in the SARS crisis,which had triggered great social fear of a threat to the residents’ lives,in the context of how urban communities in Shanghai dealt with that crisis.We found that the "combat against SARS" in Shanghai was virtually under the control of the state,with the residents playing only a passive,cooperative role.Their initiative participation was very limited.In tactics,the state controlled the channel for "theme construction" through regulating the main media on one hand,and restricted the channel for "sociopolitical participation" with the assistance from community construction on the other hand,the result of which was the state’s legitimacy and controlling power being reinforced and the institutional structure of "a strong state,a weak society" being established in the process of dealing with a crisis.
作者 耿曙 胡玉松
出处 《社会》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期41-73,共33页 Chinese Journal of Sociology
基金 上海财经大学"211工程"三期重点学科建设项目(2009330194)资助
关键词 国家—社会关系 城市社区 “非典”危机 媒体建构 社区网络 state-society relations urban community SARS crisis media framing community networks
  • 相关文献

参考文献78

  • 1Amenta, Edwin. 2001. State-Centered and Political Institutional Theory.. Retrospect and Prospect. in The Handbook of Political Sociology: States, Civil Societies, and Globalization, edited by Thomas Janoski, et al. NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • 2Barkey, Karen and Sunita Parikh. 1991. "Comparative Perspectives on the State." Annual Review of Sociology(17) : 523 - 549.
  • 3Brook, Timothy and Frolic, B. Michael. 1997. "The Ambiguous of Civil Society." In Civil Society in China, M Timothy Rrook and B. Michael Frolic (eds.). E. Sharpe, Inc.
  • 4陈德升,编.2005.两岸危机管理-SARS经验、教训与比较.台北:晶典文化事业出版社.
  • 5陈晓运.2010.去组织化:业主集体行动的策略-以G市反垃圾焚烧厂建设为例[G]//首届中国城市基层治理研究前沿论坛论文集.
  • 6代洪亮.“非典”流行时期的国家与社会[J].济南大学学报(社会科学版),2003,13(6):20-26. 被引量:4
  • 7戴云光,等.2004.SARS报道与新闻客观性[G]//SARS与中国社会.上海大学SARS与中国社会课题组.上海:上海大学出版社.
  • 8Davis, Deborah and Helen Siu (eds.). 2007. SARS:Reception and Interpretations in Three Chinese Cities. London & New York: Routledge.
  • 9Derleth, J. and D. R. Koldyk. 2004. "The Shequ Experiment: Grassroots Political Reform in Urban China." Journal of Contemporary China 13(41) : 747 - 777.
  • 10丁学良.2005.应对SARS危机的三种体制:强制、法制、弱制[G]//两岸危机管理:SARS经验、教训与比较.陈德升,编.台北:晶典文化事业出版社.

二级参考文献291

共引文献1052

同被引文献718

引证文献34

二级引证文献822

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部