物流金融中季节性存货质押融资质押率决策被引量：114

Decision of loon-to-calue katios of seasonal inventon/pledge financing based on logistics finance

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要物流金融创新模式下的存货质押融资业务能有效解决供应链上的资金瓶颈,具有很大发展空间,但风险控制水平的滞后严重制约了业务的成长.本文针对基于统一授信的物流金融创新模式中季节性存货质押融资业务的核心风险控制指标——质押率展开研究,首先考虑统一授信模式的特征及成本收益结构,借鉴贸易融资中"主体+债项"的风险评估思路,构建融资约束下的报童模型,分析风险中性的借款企业的再订购决策;进而,通过借款企业和物流企业的Stackelberg动态博弈,分析下侧风险规避的物流企业的质押率决策.研究表明,在统一授信模式下,下侧风险规避的物流企业必须针对不同借款企业的再订购决策反应设定相应质押率才能使决策最优,而且针对初始质押存货不同的借款企业,贷款下侧风险的限制对物流企业最优质押率决策会造成不同程度的影响. Inventory pledge financing in the innovative mode of logistics finance can effectively solve capital bottleneck in the supply chain and has a lot scope to develop. However, it is seriously constrained by the level of risk control. This paper focuses on loan-to-value ratios, i.e. the core indicator of risk in seasonal inventory financing in the uniform credit mode. Based on the features of this mode and the relevant cost-benefit structure, we build a newsvendor model with financial constraints and analyze reordering decisions made by riskneutral borrowers. Then, based on a dynamic Stackelberg game between borrowers and logistics enterprises, we investigate loan-to-value ratio decisions of downside-risk-adverse logistics enterprises. The results show that in uniform credit mode, downside-risk-averse logistics enterprises should set loan-to-value ratios according to different borrowers＇ reordering plans and then make their optimal decisions. Moreover, for the borrowers with different initial inventory, downside-risk limits affect the optimal decision of logistics enterprises differently.

作者李毅学汪寿阳冯耕中

机构地区江西财经大学产业集群与企业发展研究中心中国科学院数学与系统科学研究院西安交通大学管理学院

出处《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第11期19-32,共14页 Journal of Management Sciences in China

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目(70731003 71062013) 教育部人文社会科学基金资助项目(09YJC790127) 江西省自然科学基金资助项目(2009GQS0006)

关键词物流金融存货融资质押质押率统一授信 logistics finance inventory financing pledge loan-to-value ratios uniform credit

分类号 F830.56 [经济管理—金融学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献28

1中国人民银行,世界银行集团,国际金融公司中国项目开发部.中国动产担保物权与信贷市场发展[M].北京:中信出版社,2006.
2Rosenblatt M J. Multi-item inventory system with budgetary constraint: A comparison between the lagrangian and the fixed cycle approach[ J]. International Journal of Production Research. 1981, 19(4) : 331 -339.
3Li L, Shubik M, Sobel M J. Control of dividends, capital subscriptions and physical inventories[ R]. Working paper. Yale School of Management, 2005. available at: < http ://ssm. corn/abstract = 690564 >.
4Hu Q H, Sobel M J. Echelon base-stock policies are financially sub-optimal[ J]. Operations Research Letters, 2007, 35: 561 - 566.
5Protopappa-Sieke M, Seifert R W. Interrelating operational and financial performance measurements [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 204 : 439 - 448.
6Buzacott J A, Zhang R Q. Inventory management with asset-based financing [ J ]. Management Science, 2004,24:1274 - 1292.
7Dada M, Hu Q H. Financing newsvendor inventory[ J]. Operations Research Letters, 2008, 36 : 569 - 573.
8Gupt D, Wang L. A stochastic inventory model with trade-credit [ J ]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2009, 11(1): 4-18.
9Peterson M A, Rajah R G. Trade credit: Theories and evidence[ J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 1997, 10:661 -691.
10Thangam A, Uthayakumar R. Two-echelon trade credit financing for perishable items in a supply chain when demand de- pends on both selling price and credit period [ J ]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2009, 57:773 -786.