期刊文献+

急性肾损伤RIFLE与AKIN标准在重症监护病房患者的应用比较 被引量:23

The sensitivity and accuracy of RIFLE and AKIN criteria for acute kidney injury diagnosis in intensive care unit patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较急性肾损伤(AKI)RIFLE标准(危险、损伤、衰竭、肾功能丧失、终末期肾病)与急性肾损伤网络工作小组(AKIN)诊断标准在重症监护病房(ICU)成人患者中的应用价值。方法收集广东省人民医院ICU2009年10月至2010年7月成人患者的病历资料。分别采用RIFLE标准与AKIN标准对ICU中AKI及其严重程度进行定义分期,比较两种标准诊断的敏感性及预测院内病死率的准确性。结果共人选患者524例,其中符合RIFLE标准的AKI95例,符合AKIN标准的AKI135例,两种标准在判断ICU患者AKI的发生率方面差异有统计学意义(18.1%比25.8%,P〈0.05)。AKI为院内死亡的独立危险因素;RIFLE标准预测患者院内死亡的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)下面积(AUC)为0.7293,95%可信区间(95%CI)为0.6005~0.8581,P〈0.001;AKIN标准预测患者院内死亡的AUC为0.7777,95%CI为0.6664~0.8890,P〈0.001;二者诊断AKI的预测能力比较差异无统计学意义(37.9%比34.1%,P〉0.05)。结论与RIFLE标准相比,AKIN标准在诊断ICU成人患者AKI的发生方面更敏感,但是在预测院内死亡方面并未体现优势。 Objective To evaluate the sensitivity/accuracy of 2 different acute kidney injury (AKI) diagnosis/classification criteria, the RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss of kidney function, end-stage kidney disease) and the acute kidney injury network (AKIN), for patients in intensive care unit (ICU). Methods Clinical data were collected from all adult patients admitted to the Department of Intensive Medicine in Guangdong General Hospital between October 2009 and July 2010, and AKI cases were identified/classified using RIFLE and AKIN criteria separately, for statistical evaluation of their diagnostic sensitivity, and accuracy in hospital mortality prediction. Results In all 524 patients evaluated, AKI were identified by RIFLE criteria in 95 of them, while by AKIN, 135. The AKI incidence by RIFLE (18.1%), and AKIN (25.8%) were significantly different (P〈0.05). Meanwhile, AKI incidence was found independent from the mortality, either by RIFLE or AKIN (both P〈0. 001). In all patients, the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve), the index for hospital mortality prediction, was 0. 729 3 for RIFLE[with 95% confidence interval (95%CI) ranging from 0. 600 5 to 0. 858 1, P〈0. 001], and for AKIN, 0. 777 7 (95%CI: 0. 666 4 - 0. 889 0, P〈0. 001). No significant difference was found between the total hospital mortality by the two criteria (37.9% vs. 34.1%, P〉 0.05). Conclusion Although AKIN criteria has higher sensitivity in AKI diagnosis, it is not different from the RIFLE criteria in predicting hospital mortality in critically ill patients.
出处 《中国危重病急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第12期759-762,共4页 Chinese Critical Care Medicine
基金 广东省自然科学基金资助项目(9151170003000015) 广东省科技计划项目(20108031600157)
关键词 肾损伤 急性 重症监护病房 RIFLE标准 AKIN标准 院内病死率 Acute kidney injury Intensive care unit RIFLE criteria AKIN criteria Hospital- mortality
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1陆任华,方燕,高嘉元,蔡宏,朱铭力,张敏芳,戴慧莉,张伟明,倪兆慧,钱家麒,严玉澄.住院患者急性肾损伤发病情况及危险因素分析[J].中国危重病急救医学,2011,23(7):413-417. 被引量:35
  • 2Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum A, et al. Acute renal failuredefinition ,outcome measures, animal models ,fluid therapy and information technology needs : the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care,2004,8:R204-212.
  • 3Ostermann M ,Chang RW. Acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit according to RIFLE. Crit Care Med, 2007,35:1837- 1843.
  • 4Mehta RL,Kellum JA,Shah SV,et al. Acute Kidney Injury Network:report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care,2007,11 :R31.
  • 5Yegenaga I, Tuglular S, Ari E, et al. Evaluation of sepsis/ systemic inflammatory response syndrome, acute kidney injury, and RIFLE criteria in two tertiary hospital intensive care units in Turkey. Nephron Clin Pract, 2010,115 .c276-282.
  • 6D'Onofrio A,Cruz D,Bolgan I,et al. RIFLE criteria for cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: risk factors and outcomes. Congest Heart Fail, 2010,16 :S32-36.
  • 7席修明.从急性肾衰竭到急性肾损伤[J].中国危重病急救医学,2010,22(12):705-706. 被引量:12
  • 8Minejima E,Choi J,Beringer P,et al. Applying new diagnostic criteria for acute kidney injury to facilitate early identification of nephrotoxicity in vancomycin-treated patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2011,55: 3278-3283.
  • 9李深,俞国旭.老年患者髋部手术后发生急性肾损伤的相关因素分析[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志,2010,17(2):105-107. 被引量:9
  • 10Lopes JA,Fernandes P, Jorge S,et al. Acute kidney injury in intensive care unit patients:a comparison between the RIFLE and the Acute Kidney Injury Network classifications. Crit Care, 2008,12 :R110.

二级参考文献100

  • 1王悦,崔专,范敏华.住院患者中急性肾功能衰竭的流行病学和病因学分析[J].中国危重病急救医学,2005,17(2):117-120. 被引量:41
  • 2余青春,任文杰,宋英华,韦红贞.连续性血液净化治疗急性重症肾功能衰竭[J].中国危重病急救医学,2005,17(9):571-571. 被引量:11
  • 3彭炎强,史伟,叶智明,梁馨苓,何朝生,章斌,王文健,梁永正.检测血清胱抑素C诊断急性肾衰竭的研究[J].新医学,2005,36(10):570-572. 被引量:23
  • 4Kellum JA. Acute kidney injury [J]. Crit Care Med, 2008, 36: S141-5.
  • 5Dharnidharka VR, Kwon C, Stevens G. Serum Cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function: a meta-analysis[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2002, 40(2): 221-6.
  • 6Kellum JA, Bouman C, Lameire N, et al. Acute dialysis quality initiative. Definitions of acute renal failure [EB/OL]. http: /www. anes.upmc.edu/mcctp/adqi02.html.
  • 7Herget-Rosenthal S, Marggraf G, Husing J, et al. Early detection of acute renal failure by serum Cystatin C[J].Kidney hat, 2004, 66(3): 1115-22.
  • 8Devarajan P. Proteomics for the investigation of acute kidney injury [J]. Contrib Nephrol, 2008, 160: 1-16.
  • 9Gokkusu CA, Ozden TA, Gul H, et al. Relationship between plasma Cystatin C and creatinine in chronic renal diseases and Tx-transplant patients[J]. Clin Biochem, 2004, 37(2): 94-7.
  • 10Hoek FJ, Kemperman FA, Krediet RT. A comparison between Cystatin C, plasma creatinine and the Cockcroft and Gault formula for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate [J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2003, 18(10): 2024-31.

共引文献83

同被引文献349

引证文献23

二级引证文献153

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部