摘要
戴震对理学"理"、"欲"二分思想进行了批判,提出"理存乎欲"的观点,其思想路径是将"理欲之辨"与对理学诠释传统的批判结合起来。戴震在"理欲之辨"中展开了对理学以"自私"为特征的诠释传统的反思,进而提出"无私"与"无蔽"的观念,对理解的历史性进行了批判,同时,其"理"、"欲"统一思想的阐发亦在此过程中得到了完成。
Dai Zhen criticized Neo - Confucianism viewpoint of the rivalry between principle and desires, and put forward ＂prineiple included in desires＂. The thought approach was to integrate of ＂discussion between principle and desires＂ with the criticism of Neo- Confucianism hermeneutics tradition. In the ＂discussion between principle and desires＂, Dai Zhen criticized Neo - Confucianism hermeneutics tradition characterized by selfishness. He introduced the ideas about selfness and uncovering, achieved the criticism of historical interpretation and completed the elaboration to the unity of principle and desires.
出处
《北方论丛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第1期73-76,共4页
The Northern Forum
基金
安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目<理学.朴学.新学--徽州哲学的嬗变及其意义考析>
课题编号:AHSK09-10D92
关键词
戴震
理学
诠释学
“理欲之辨”
Dai Zhen
Neo - Confucianism
hermeneutics
discussion between principle and desires
