期刊文献+

腹腔镜、内镜联合技术在胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者中的应用 被引量:8

Application of United Technologies of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic in Patients of Gallbladder Stones Combined with Common Bile Duct Stones
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)联合术中内镜下逆行胆胰管造影(ERCP)及乳头括约肌切开(EST)取石一期治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的可行性和安全性。方法选取我院2008年1月至2010年12月应用LC联合术中ERCP一期治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者15例为观察组,选择同期采用传统开腹胆囊切除、胆总管探查取石T管引流治疗的患者25例作为对照组,比较分析两组患者的临床治疗情况。结果两组患者均手术成功,取石成功率均为100%;观察组的手术时间长于对照组,但术后通气时间和术中出血量及住院时间明显少于对照组,组间比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组的并发症发生率低于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),安全性更好。结论 LC联合术中ERCP一期治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石安全、有效,有利于患者的恢复,值得临床关注。 Objective To explore the feasibility and safety of laparoseopic cholecystectomy (LC)combined with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) during operation and endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST) as the first phase treatment for patients with gallbladder stones with bile duct stones. Methods 15 cases of gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones from January 2008 to December 2010 treated with LC combined with ERCP were selected as observation group, another 25 patients of the same period treated with conventional open cholecystectomy,common bile duct exploration T-tube drainage were selected as the contreal group, analysis and comparison on clinical treatment of the two groups was done. Results Oper- ations of the two groups were all successful ,stone extraction rate both 100%. Operation time of the observa- tion group was longer than the control group, while the postoperation ventialtion time, blood loss during the operation and hospitalization time were much leas. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant(P 〈0.05 ). Incidence of complication in observation group was less than the control group( P 〈 0.01 ), suggesting a better safety. Conclusion LC combined with ERCP during the operation treating period one gallbladder stones with bile duct stones is safe and effective, better for patients recovery, which deserves clinical attention.
出处 《医学综述》 2011年第24期3820-3821,共2页 Medical Recapitulate
关键词 胆囊结石 腹腔镜 内镜下逆行胆胰管造影 Cholecyslithiasis Laparescopic Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献53

共引文献252

同被引文献81

  • 1宁纯民.纤维胆道镜取石480例临床分析[J].中国基层医药,2007,14(7):1107-1108. 被引量:3
  • 2Bansal VK,Misra MC,Garg P,et al.A prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and common bile duet stones[J]. Surg En- dose,2010,24(8) : 1986-1989.
  • 3Toth,E.,Zawadski,A.,Thorlacius,H. et al.Gastrointestinal: Cholecys- toduodenal fistula with gallstone-induced intestinal obstruction [J].Joumal of gastroenterology and hepatology,2013,28 (2):377- 377.
  • 4Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and risk of gallstone disease: A Mendelian randomization study and meta-analyses [J].Joumal of Hepatology,2013,58(1):126-133.
  • 5Kummerow KL,Shelton C, Philllips S,et al. Predictingcomplicated choledocholithiasis[J]. J Surg Res,2012,177(1):70-74.
  • 6Joshi RM,Shetty TS, Adhikari DR,et al. Choledocholithi-* asis : endotherapy versus surgery [J], Int Surg, 2010, 92(2):95-99.
  • 7Rogers SJ, Cello JP, Horn JK, et al. Prospective random-ized trial of LC ~h LCBDE vs ERCP/S + LC for commonbile duct stone disease [ J]. Arch Surg, 2010 , 145 ( 1 );28-33.
  • 8Yachimski P, Poulose BK. ERCP vs laparoscopic commonbile duct exploration for common bile stones : are the tech-niques truly equivalent^J]. Arch Surg,2010,145(8) :795.
  • 9Bansal VK, Misra MC, Rajan K, et al. Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction foUowet by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones:a randomized contmll~d trial [ J]. Surg Endosc ,'2014, 28(3) :875-885.
  • 10Berci G,Hunter J ,Morgenstem L,et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: first,do no harm; second,take c~ of bile duct stones [J]. Surgl Endosc ,2013,27 (4) : 1051-1054.

引证文献8

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部