期刊文献+

基于生命周期理论的知识联盟激励协同成熟度研究 被引量:13

Study on the Incentive Synergy Maturity Model of Knowledge Alliances Based on the Life Cycle Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 引入成熟度模型,通过分析激励协同的影响因素和激励协同的特点构建了激励协同成熟度概念模型,包括激励协同成熟度等级划分、知识联盟生命周期和激励协同成熟度评价体系。它是一个分级提升的系统结构,通过比较知识联盟激励协同的现状和模型的异同,为知识联盟知识主体提供了明确的激励改进方法,实现了知识联盟创新知识和提升绩效的目的。 The incentive synergy of knowledge alliances is to make knowledge alliance be successfully built and run through scientifically and fairly motivation to each knowledge subject so as to achieve the maximal synergy effectiveness. But how to describe the development degree of incentive synergy is needy to be solved. By analyzing influence factors and characters of incentive synergy, this paper introduces maturity model to establish a conceptual incentive synergy maturity model which consists of incentive synergy maturity levels, life cycle and evaluation system of incentive synergy maturity index. It is a grad-ascending systematic structure, which can provide explicit improved incentive methods for knowledge subjects of knowledge alliances, by comparing the similarities and differences between the status quo and the model of incentive synergy in knowledge alliances. Eventually, purposes of innovating knowledge and improving performance can be effectively realized, which has important theoretical significances and practical values to research on incentive aspects of knowledge alliances.
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期60-68,共9页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71072120) 教育部国家培育种子基金项目(N100406060)
关键词 知识联盟 激励协同 激励协同成熟度 关键流程域 生命周期理论 knowledge alliance, incentive synergy maturity model key process area life-cycle theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Kale P, Singh H, Perlmutter H. Leafing and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relation capital[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000,21:217-237.
  • 2Dyer J H, Nobeoka K. Creating and managing a high per- formance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000,21:345-367.
  • 3Heiman B A, Nickerson J A. Empirical evidence regard- ing the tension between knowledge sharing and knowledge expropriation in collaborations[J]. Managerial and Decision Economics, 2004,25:401-420.
  • 4Amabile T M. Motivational synergy: Toward new concept- ualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the wo- rkplace[J]. Human Resource Management Review, 1993,3 (3):185-201.
  • 5田富俊,李兆友,易显飞.企业技术创新主体层次激励与协同激励研究[J].科技管理研究,2006,26(5):70-73. 被引量:5
  • 6乔梅,张春颖,满媛媛.企业知识创新的ESEK协同激励研究[J].科技进步与对策,2010,27(14):78-80. 被引量:3
  • 7单银根软件能力成熟度模型与软件开发技术[M].北京:北京航空航天大学出版社,2003.
  • 8Gulati R, Khanna T, Nohria N. Unilateral commitments and the importance of process in alliance[J]. Sloon Man- agement Review, 1994,35(3):61-70.
  • 9Montano R. A systems thinking framework for knowledge management[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2001,31(4):5-16.
  • 10Bartol K M, Srivastava A. Encouraging knowledge shar- ing: The role of organizational reward systems[J]. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 2002,9(1):64-76.

二级参考文献105

共引文献102

同被引文献267

引证文献13

二级引证文献116

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部