期刊文献+

基于专家判断的行为形成因子评分方法 被引量:7

Method of Rating Performance Shaping Factor Based on Expert Judgment
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文在研究现有行为形成因子评分方法的基础上,提出了一种新的行为形成因子评分方法,该评分方法首先将行为形成因子对人绩效的影响作用分为人的可靠性、人的工作效率和人的工作负荷三个方面,针对每个方面将行为形成因子的水平又划分成5个等级,并通过问卷调查以获取行为形成因子每个等级的支持情况;然后设置了行为形成因子的评分范围,对每个等级赋予一定的数值,并结合问卷调查的结果得到行为形成因子每个方面的评分;最后使用层次分析法获得行为形成因子三个方面的相对权重,通过加权求和最终得到行为形成因子的综合评分。这种基于专家判断的评分方法在操作上比较简便,得到的结果能够体现行为形成因子对人绩效的全面影响,可以为人因可靠性分析提供有益的指导。 The rating of performance shaping factor(PSF) is researched and a new method to rate PSF is proposed based on expert judgment. The effect of PSF on human performance is categorized into three aspects:human reliability,work efficiency and workload. For each aspect, the quality of PSF is subdivided into five levels. The questionnaires are sent out and their result is the number of experts supporting each quality level. The rating range of PSF is specified. According to the rating range, each quality level of PSF is conferred a value and the rating of each aspect of PSF is performed according to the questionnaire. The analytic hierarchy process(AHP) is introduced to weight the three aspects of PSF and the synthetic score of PSF is the sum of the weighed score of each aspect. The proposed method is easy in application and its result reflects the effect of PSF on human performance, so it can provide useful guidance for human reliability analysis.
出处 《安全与环境工程》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第1期77-81,86,共6页 Safety and Environmental Engineering
关键词 行为形成因子 评分方法 专家判断 层次分析法 人因可靠性分析 performance shaping factor method of rating expert judgment analytic hierarchy process human reliability analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Kohn, L. T. , J. M. Corrigan, M. S. Donaldson. To Err Is Hu- man : Building a Safer Health System [M]. Washington, D C: National Academy Press,2000.
  • 2Salmon, P. M, M. A. Regan, I. Johnston. Human Error and Road Transport:Phase One- A Framework for an Error Tolerant Road Transport System [R]. Australia: Monash University Acci- dent Research Center,2005.
  • 3Issae, A. , S. T. Shorroek, R. Kennedy. Technical Review of Hu- man Performance Models and Taxonomies of Human Error in ATM(HERA) (HRS-002-REP-01)[R]. European Air Traffic Management Programme, 2002.
  • 4Kim,J. W. , W. D. Jung. A taxonomy of performance influence factors for human reliability analysis of emergency tasks[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2003,16 (1) :479--495.
  • 5孙志强,史秀建,刘凤强,谢红卫.人为差错成因分析方法研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,18(6):21-27. 被引量:25
  • 6Swain, A. D. , H. E. Guttmann. Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications (NUREG/CR- 1278) [ R]. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regula- tory Commission, 1983.
  • 7Williams,J. C. A data-based method for assessing and reducing human error to improve operational performance[A]. IEEE 4th Conference on Human Factor and Power Plants ,Monterey[C]. California :IEEE, 1988 : 436--453.
  • 8Gertman,D. I, H. S. Blackman, J. Marble. The SPAR-H Human Reliability Analysis Method ( NUREG/ CR-6883 ) [R]. Washing- ton, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2004.
  • 9Gertman,D. I,H. S. Blackman,L. N. Haney. Intent:a method for estimating human error probabilities for deeision-based errors [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1992,35 (2) : 127--136.
  • 10Chang, Y. H. J. , A. Mosleh. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistie simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents,Part 1-5[J]. Reliability Engineering and Sys- tem Safety,2007,92(8) :997--1101.

二级参考文献19

  • 1邓连军,刘祖德.海上石油平台安全应急培训——以Piper Alpha平台火灾导致沉没事故为例[J].安全与环境工程,2005,12(3):81-83. 被引量:4
  • 2于广涛,王二平.不良安全文化的特征:事故报告再分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(10):21-26. 被引量:19
  • 3贾洪飞,司银霞,孙宝凤.驾驶员自身因素对限速标志识别能力的影响分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2007,17(2):50-54. 被引量:2
  • 4A. Isaac, S. T. Shorrock, R. Kennedy, et al. Technical Review of Human Performance Models and Taxonomies of Human Error in ATM (HERA) [R]. EATMP Report, 2002
  • 5T. Kletz. An Engineer's View of Human Error (3^rd Eds)[M]. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2001
  • 6Accident due to human error ' [ EB]. http ://www. chinadaily. net/cndy/2008 - 04/29/content_6650063. htm, 2008 - 04 - 29
  • 7Swain A D, Guttmann H E. Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications (NUREG/CR-1278) [R]. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1983
  • 8Williams J C. A Data- based method for assessing and reducing human error to improve operational performance [ A]. Procding of IEEE 4^th Human Factor and Power Plants[C], 1988:436 -453
  • 9M. Barriere. Technical Basis and Implementation Guidelines for a Technique for Human Event Analysis (ATHEANA) (NUREG -1624) [R]. Rev. 1, Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2000
  • 10Hollnagel E. Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) [ M]. London: Elsevier Science Ltd, 1998

共引文献34

同被引文献56

引证文献7

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部