期刊文献+

复杂性输尿管上段结石的两种微创手术方法的疗效比较 被引量:17

Comparison of two minimally invasive methods for complicated upper ureteric calculi
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较经皮肾镜取石术(percutaneous nephrolithotomy,PCNL)和后腹腔镜下输尿管切开取石术(retro-peritoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy,RLU)治疗复杂性输尿管上段结石的疗效。方法:回顾性分析71例复杂性输尿管上段结石患者临床资料,PCNL组31例和RLU组40例,对比两组病例手术时间、术后1周结石清除率、手术并发症。结果:71例手术全部成功,手术时间PCNL组[(48.52±17.51)min]短于RLU组[(87.43±22.63)min],差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。术后1周结石清除率PCNL组为96.8%(30/31),RLU组100%(40/40),两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术中、术后均无明显出血及周围脏器损伤等并发症。术后随访3~10个月,平均7个月,两组均未发现结石复发及输尿管狭窄。结论:PCNL和RLU治疗复杂性输尿管上段结石均是安全、有效的方法。复杂性输尿管上段结石的治疗可视患者具体情况、单位设备条件、术者经验酌情选择PCNL或RLU。 Objective: To evaluate the effect of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL) in the management of complicated upper ureteric calculi,comparing with retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy(RLU).Methods: Seventy-one cases with complicated upper ureteric calculi were retrospectively investigated(PCNL group 31 cases,RLU group 40 cases).Clinical data including operation time,stone free rate and the surgical complications were statistically analyzed.Results: All the operations were successful in all 71 cases.As compared to the RLU group,the PCNL group had a significant shorter operation time [(48.52±17.51) min vs(87.43±22.63)min,P〈0.01],and significant difference were detected.A week after the operation,the PCNL group showed a stone free rate of 96.8%(30/31) while the RLU group 100%(40/40),and no significant difference were detected.No significant complications,such as intraoperative or postoperative bleeding and damage to surrounding organs,were detected.The patients were followed up for 3 to 10 months(mean,7 months),and no recurrent stones or ureteral stricture were developed during the period.Conclusion: Both PCNL and RLU are safe and effective for complicated upper ureteral calculi.The appropriate method depends on the patients′ specific conditions,the unit equipments and the experience of operator.
出处 《江苏大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2012年第1期69-72,共4页 Journal of Jiangsu University:Medicine Edition
关键词 复杂性输尿管上段结石 经皮肾镜取石术 后腹腔镜下输尿管切开取石术 complicated upper ureteric calculi prcutaneous nephrolithotomy laparoscopic ureterolithotomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献29

  • 1李建兴,牛亦农,田溪泉,康宁,王学科.经皮肾镜气压弹道联合超声碎石术的安全性及疗效分析[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(28):1975-1977. 被引量:165
  • 2Nualyong C, Taweemonkongsap T. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for upper ureteric calculi. J Med Assoc Thai, 1999,82:1028--1033.
  • 3Gaur D D, Trivedi S, Prabhudesai M R, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: technical considerations and long-term follow-up. BJU Int, 2002,89 : 339-- 343.
  • 4Srlvastava A, Ahlawat R, Kumar A, et al. Management of impacted upper ureterlc calculi: Results of lithotrlpsy and percutaneous litholapaxy. Br J Urol, 1992,70:252-257.
  • 5Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA, et al. The "mini-pew" technique: a less invasive alternative to petcutaneous nephrolithotomy.World J Urol, 1998,16:371-374.
  • 6Kumar V, Ahlawat R, Banjeree GK, et al. Percutaneous ureterolitholapaxy : the best bet to clear large bulk impacted upper ureteral calculi.Arch Esp Urol, 1996,49:86-91.
  • 7Berkhoff WBC, Meijer F. Percutaneous antegrade tiberoptic ureterorenoscopic treatment of ureteral caculi. J Urol, 1990,144:628-630.
  • 8Liong ML, Clayman RV, Gittes RF, et al. Treatment options for proximal ureteral nrolithiasis: Rewiev and recommendations. J Urol, 1989,141:504-509.
  • 9Bartel M.Retroperitoneoscopy:an endoscopic method for inspection and bioptic examination of the retroperitoneal space. Zentralbl Chir,1969,94:377-383.
  • 10Wurtz A. Endoscopy of the retroperitoneal space: technics, results and current indications. Ann Chir, 1989,43:475-480.

共引文献765

同被引文献129

  • 1杨旭凯,王养民,周逢海,董永超,常德辉,赵建波,康印东,张斌,杨琦,彭风,黄创.后腹腔镜与输尿管镜对复杂性输尿管中上段结石的疗效比较[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2014,3(4). 被引量:6
  • 2宋晓霞.128例肾输尿管结石临床分析[J].高校保健医学研究与实践,2005,2(4):32-34. 被引量:1
  • 3黄锦坤,李逊,吴开俊,袁坚,罗金泰.3种不同术式治疗复杂输尿管上段结石的疗效比较——随机对照研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2006,6(2):103-105. 被引量:123
  • 4王中盛,陈炳华,杜庆寿.输尿管结石所致<10mm肾积水的超声诊断[J].江苏大学学报(医学版),2006,16(2):130-131. 被引量:2
  • 5Lee Y H, Tsai J Y, Jiaan B P, et al. Prospective ran- domized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ure- teroscopie lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteralstones[J]. Urology, 2006, 67(5) 480- 484.
  • 6Hammady A, Gamal W M, Zaki M, et al. Evaluation of ureteraI stent placement after retroperitoneal laparo- scopic ureterolithotomy for upper ureteral stone: ran- domized controlled study[J]. J Endourol, 2011, 25 (5) : 825-830.
  • 7J GoetR, Aron M, Kesarwani PK,et a/.Percutaneous ante- grade removal of impacted 'upper -ureteral calculi :still the treatment of choice in developing countries[J].J En- dourol, 2005,19(7) : 54-57. '.
  • 8Degirmenci T, Gunlusoy B, Kozacioglu Z, et al. Outcomes of Ureteroscopy for the Management of Impacted Ureteral Calculi With Different Localizations [ J ].Urology, 2012,80 (4) :811-815.
  • 9Shao Y, Wang DW, Lu GL, et al. Retroperitoneal laparo- seopicureterolithotomy in comparison with ureteroscopic lithotfipsy in the management of impacted upper ureteral stones larger than 12 mm [ J]. World J Urol, 2015, 33 ( 11 ) : 1841-1845.
  • 10Karami H, Javanmard B, Hasanzadeh-Hadah A, et al.Is it necessary to place a double j catheter after laparoscopie ureterolithotomy? A four-year experience [ J ]. J Endourol,2012,26(9) :1183-1186.

引证文献17

二级引证文献151

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部