期刊文献+

微种植体辅助整体内收上前牙段的头影测量 被引量:4

A clinical cephalometric study of mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of eight maxillary anterior teeth
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究微种植体支抗在矫治上颌前突病例中整体内收上前牙段的应用。方法:选择5例上颌前突患者,拔除第二前磨牙,采用直丝弓矫治技术,辅以微种植体支抗同时整体内收前牙段(6个前牙及2个第一前磨牙),通过X线头影测量分析,观察矫治前后上颌骨软硬组织的变化。结果:上颌骨的变化轻微;切牙平均内收(4.6±1.5)mm,压低(0.8±1.1)mm,根尖后移(1.7±1.4)mm,切牙与腭平面的夹角减少(6.8±3.5)度;支抗磨牙水平前移(0.5±0.3)mm,没有出现明显的颌向伸长;上唇突度减少(2.0±0.9)mm,鼻唇角增大(3±2.4)度。结论:微种植体能提供稳定的支抗,同时整体内收上前牙段,最大限度避免支抗的丧失,改善上唇突度。 Aim: To Study the efficiency of mini-implants as intraoral anchorage units for en-masse re-traction of the 6 maxillary anterior teeth and 2 first premolars after the second premolars are extracted.Methods: Five patients requiring high anchorage after extraction of the maxillary second premolars wereselected for this study. Straight wire appliance and mini-implants were used for en-masse retraction, Hori-zontal, vertical, and angular positions of the maxillary ? rst molar and central incisor were evaluated ceph-alometrically before and after orthodontic retraction. Results: The edge of upper incisors were retracted(4. 6 ± 1.5 )mm and intruded (0. 8 ± 1.1 ) mm, the root apex moved distally ( 1.7 ± 1.4) mm. The maxil-lary first molars showed mesial movement of (0. 5 ± 0. 3 ) mm. The nasolabial angle increased (3 ± 2. 4)° and the angle between upper incisor and PP-plane decreased (6. 8 ± 3.5 )°. Conclusion: Mini-implants are efficient for intraoral anchorage reinforcement for en-masse retraction and intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth.
出处 《暨南大学学报(自然科学与医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期632-636,共5页 Journal of Jinan University(Natural Science & Medicine Edition)
基金 广东省自然科学基金项目(7001570)
关键词 X线头影测量 微种植体支抗 整体内收 X-ray cephalometric study mini-implant en-masse retraction
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1傅民魁.口腔正畸学[M].5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:6.
  • 2李冰,赵清波,杨其国,曹军.拔牙矫治后前牙根尖移动量与牙槽基骨突度改变量的相关性研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2009,25(1):111-114. 被引量:5
  • 3SODAGAR A,BORUJENI D G,AMINI G.Prediction of soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic retraction of incisors in Iranian girls[J].World J Orthod,2010,11(3):262-268.
  • 4SAYINSU K,ISIK F,ULGEN A N.A comparative study of profile changes with 3 different distalization mechanics[J].World J Orthod,2007,8(1):37-44.
  • 5WHOLLEY C J,WOODS M G.Tooth and lip responses to three commonly prescribed premolar extraction sequences:a review of recent research findings[J].Aust Orthod J,2004,20(2):115-121.
  • 6KHAN M,FIDA M.Soft tissue profile response in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment[J].J Coll Physicians Surg Pak,2010,20(7):454-459.
  • 7ZIEGLER P,INGERVALL B.A clinical study of maxillary canine retraction with a retraction spring and with sliding mechanics[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1989,95(2):99-106.
  • 8ANDREASEN G F,ZWANZIGER D.A clinical evaluation of the differential force concept as applied to the edgewise bracket[J].Am J Orthod,1980,78 (1):25-40.
  • 9DINCER M,ISCAN H M.The effects of differential sectional arches in canine retraction[J]. Eur J Orthod,1994,16(4):317-323.
  • 10BAKER R W,GUAY A H,PETERSON H W.Current concepts of anchorage management[J].Am J Orthod,1972,42(2):129-138.

二级参考文献8

共引文献24

同被引文献34

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部