期刊文献+

磁共振弥散加权成像对鼻咽癌靶区勾画和复发转移预测的临床价值研究 被引量:17

The value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in gross tumor volume definition andtumor recurrence/metastasis prediction in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨磁共振弥散加权成像(DWMRI)能否预测鼻咽癌调强放疗后复发和转移以及判断靶区范围的价值。方法回顾2008年6月起初次调强放疗的鼻咽癌病历资料,选择有复发或转移36例和无复发转移36例作对照。对两组病例在DWMRI上测量其疗前肿瘤表观弥散系数(ADC值),并行成组t检验推测ADC值是否能预测鼻咽癌复发和转移。回顾分析局部区域复发病例放疗前MRI,从影像学角度分析DWMRI是否有助于判断靶区范围。结果复发或转移组、对照组疗前ADC均值分别为(0.753±0.091)×10^-3、(0.793-4-0.094)×10^-3mm^2/s(t=-1.79,P=0.078)。影像学回顾分析显示DWMRI在低本底上突显了肿瘤侵犯范围,局部区域复发共16例,15例疗前常规MRI弥散序列在病变范围上一致,1例复发患者DWMRI序列较常规序列更准确地预测了病变复发部位。结论DWMRI结合常规MRI可更准确地判断鼻咽癌靶区范围,但其疗前ADC值的高低与鼻咽癌复发或转移并无关联。 Objective To investigate the value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) in gross tumor volume definition and localregional recurrence/distant metastasis prediction in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods From Jun. 2008 to Feb. 2011, each of 36 patients with or without localregional recurrence and/or distant metastasis treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy in our hospital was matched in this study. The difference of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values between these two groups was compared by t-test method. The conventional MRI and DWMRI before treatment were centrally reviewed to evaluated whether DWMRI would benefit to the definition of gross tumor volume. Results The mean ADC value were (0. 753 ~: 0. 091 ) x 10-3 mm2/s and (0.793 + 0. 094) ~ 10-3 mm2/s in treatment failure group and control group, respectively ( t = - 1.79, P = 0. 078 ). The extension of gross tumor volume were much more outstanding in DWMRI when compared to conventional MRI. DWMRI predicted loealregional recurrence more accuracy than conventional MRI in one patient . Conclusions DWMRI is help to definition of gross tumor volume. The ADC value before radiotherapy can not predict the loealregional recurrence and/or distant metastasis for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期105-107,共3页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
关键词 鼻咽肿瘤 磁共振弥散加权成像 表观弥散系数 Nasopharyngeal neoplasm Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging Apparent diffusion coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1陈韵彬 毛瑜 潘建基 等.鼻咽癌弥散加权成像临床研究.中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2009,18(2):88-91.
  • 2Pope WB, Lai A, Mehta R, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis stratifies progression-free survival in newly diagnosed bevacizumab-treated glioblastoma. Am J Neuroradiol, 2011,32 : 882-889.
  • 3黄生富,朱向帜,许建华,姜雪松,张宜勤.116例鼻咽癌一体化照射野调强放疗的疗效分析[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2010,15(10):895-899. 被引量:13
  • 4Liu WS, Wu MF, Tseng HC,et al. The role of pretreatment FIG- PET in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2011 ,In press.
  • 5何侠,朱向帜,黄德健,李裕,吴建伟,沈文荣,魏宝清.磁共振弥散加权成像和PET/CT在鼻咽癌调强放射治疗中的应用[J].肿瘤学杂志,2008,14(10):783-786. 被引量:16
  • 6Aoyagi T, Shuto K, Okazumi S, et al. Apparent diffusion eoeffieient values measured by diffusion-weighted imaging predict chemoradiotherapeutie effect for advanced esophageal eaneer. Dig Surg,2011,28 :252-257.
  • 7Razek AA, Fathy A, Gawad TA. Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic parameters of lung cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr,2011,35 :248-252.
  • 8Park SH, Moon WK, Cho N, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Radiology, 2010, 257:56-63.
  • 9Zhang Y, Chen JY, Xie CM, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of response of advanced cervical cancer to chemoradiation. J Comput Assist Tomogr,2011,35 :102- 107.

二级参考文献26

  • 1宗井凤,马骏,唐玲珑,黄莹,刘立志,林爱华,崔念基,卢泰祥.鼻咽癌综合治疗策略研究——749例疗效分析[J].中国肿瘤,2005,14(8):538-542. 被引量:46
  • 2翟振宇,何侠,魏青,张宜勤.鼻咽癌调强放射治疗的剂量学特点[J].肿瘤学杂志,2005,11(5):337-340. 被引量:21
  • 3张赟,梁碧玲,高立,钟镜联,叶瑞心,沈君.颈部淋巴结的MR扩散加权成像[J].临床放射学杂志,2007,26(3):244-247. 被引量:35
  • 4Grégoire V,Levendag P,Ang KK,et al.CT-based delineation of lymph node levels and related CTVs in the node-negative neck:DAHANCA,EORTC,GORTEC,NCIC,RTOG consensus guidelines[J].Radiother Oncol,2003,69 (3):227-236.
  • 5Au JS,Law CK,Foo W,et al.In-depth evaluation of the AJCC/UICC 1997 staging system of nasopharyngeal carcinoma:Prognostic homogeneity and proposed refinements[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2003,56(2):413-426.
  • 6Teo P,Yu P,Lee WY,et al.Significant prognosticators after primary radiotherapy in 903 nondisseminated nasopharyngeal carcinoma evaluated by computer tomography[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1996.36(2):291-304.
  • 7Lee AW,Pooh YF,Foo W,et al.Retrospective analysis of 5073 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated during 1976 1985:Overall survival and patterns of failure[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1992,23(2):261-270.
  • 8Sultanem K,Shu HK,Xia P,et al.Three-dimensional intensitymodulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma:the University of California-San Francisco experience[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000,48 (3):711-722.
  • 9Lin S,Pan J,Hart L,et al.Nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with reduced-volume intensity-modulated radiation therapy:report on the 3-year outcome of a prospective series[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2009,75(4):1071-1078.
  • 10Lee N,Harris J,Garden AS,et al.Intensity-Modulated radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for nasoparyngeal carcinoma:Radiation Therapy Oncology Group phase Ⅱ trial 0225[J].J Clin Oncol,2009,27(22):3684-3690.

共引文献35

同被引文献138

引证文献17

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部