期刊文献+

腹腔镜在精索内静脉高位结扎术中的临床应用价值-附157例分析 被引量:7

The clinical value of laparoscopy in ligation of spermatic veins
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜在精索内静脉高位结扎术中的临床应用价值。方法选取本院收治的精索静脉曲张患者157例,随机分为3组:精索全结扎组(A组)、保留睾丸动脉组(B组)、保留睾丸动脉与淋巴管组(C组),行腹腔镜手术治疗,比较各组的精液质量改善情况以及并发症的发生率。结果①各组术后精液质量较术前均明显提高,其中C组改善最明显,与A组相比有极明显差异,与B组相比无统计学差异;B组与A组相比有明显差异。②C组继发性鞘膜积液的发生率最低;B组虽低于A组,但无统计学意义。C组与B组睾丸萎缩的发生率明显低于A组,有统计学差异。三组术后复发的发生率两两比较无明显统计学差异。结论保留精索淋巴管道可降低术后的发生率,较精索全结扎更有利于精液质量的改善,与保留睾丸动脉比较,其精液质量也有一定的改善,尽管无统计学意义上的差别;保留睾丸动脉可降低术后睾丸萎缩的发生率,较精索全结扎有利于精液质量的改善。 Objectives To investigate the clinical value of laparoscopy in ligation of spennatic veins. Methods 157 patients diagnosed with varicocele were enrolled in the study. All cases were randomized into three groups: ligatian of spermatic vessels group ( group A), testicular artery sparing group ( group B), testicular artery and lymph vessels sparing group ( group C). The therapeutic effects after three different kinds of operation were evaluated by improvement of semen quality and complications related to operation. Results (1)The quality of semen in all groups was improved after operation compared with that of before operation. Significant improvement of semen quality was found in group C when compared with group A. The quality of semen postoperatively was better in group B than in group A. However, no statistical difference was found between group C and group B. (2)The rate of hydrocele in group C was lowest, obviously lower than group A and group B. Although, the rate of hydrocele in group B was slightly lower than group A, no statistical difference could be found. The rates of testicular atrophy in group C and group B were lower than group A. When the recurrence rate were evaluated, group A, group B and group C showed similar results. Conclusions The rate of hydrocele can be reduced by sparing lymph vessels ligation of permatic veins. The quality of semen can be significantly improved by sparing lymph vessels in laparoscopic varicocele ligation. Furthermore, although no statistical difference of sperm quality is found between lymph sparing group and testicular artery sparing group, it is seemed that improvement of semen in lymph sparing group is better. Preservation of testicular artery can improve the semen quality and reduce the rate of testicular atrophy after operation.
出处 《国际泌尿系统杂志》 2012年第2期188-192,共5页 International Journal of Urology and Nephrology
关键词 精索静脉曲张 外手手术 腹腔镜 结扎术 Varicocele Surgical Procedures, Laparoscopic Ligation
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1吴阶平.吴阶平泌尿外科学.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001;163:271,944-945
  • 2黄宇峰.男性诊断学.上海:第二军医大学出版社,1989:67-70.
  • 3王威,王宁.亚临床型精索静脉曲张患者手术前后精液分析[J].中华男科学杂志,2007,13(7):656-657. 被引量:6
  • 4王颂.精索静脉曲张不同手术方式疗效观察与比较(附685例分析).吉林:吉林大学,2008.
  • 52003. Oxford:Update Software. Search date 2000, primary sources Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's specialisedr- egister of controlled trials, Medline, a hand search of 22 specialist journals and search of references of identified studies.
  • 6Krause W. Does treatment of varicocele improve male fertility? Re- sults of the "Deutsche Varikozelenstudie", a mulitcentre study of 14 collaborating centers. Andrologia ,2002,34,164 - 171.
  • 7罗丽兰.不孕与不育[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.535-539.
  • 8Sterm R, Kister W. The Palomo procedure in the treatment of boys with varicocele: a retrospective study of testieular growth and fertili- ty. Pediatr Surge Int, 1998,14:74 - 78.
  • 9Esposito C, Monguzzi G. Results and complications of laparoscopic for pediatric varicocele. J Pediatr Surg,2001,36(5 ) :767 - 769.
  • 10Lund L,Tang YC,Roebuck D,et al. Testicular catch - up growth after varicocele correction in adolescents. Pediatr Surg Int, 1999, 15(4) :234-237.

二级参考文献21

  • 1蒋志强,曾青,钟狂飚,何乐业,蒋先镇.腹腔镜和开放手术行精索静脉曲张腹膜后高位结扎术的对比[J].中国内镜杂志,2004,10(6):31-32. 被引量:48
  • 2初洪钢,郭瑞强,孙彬,孙有刚,王世敏.男性不育患者精索静脉曲张的超声诊断研究[J].中华男科学杂志,2005,11(7):514-516. 被引量:10
  • 3彭轼平.精索疾病[A].见:吴阶平主编.泌尿外科[C].济南:山东科学技术出版社,1993.934-936.
  • 4Hagood PG, Mehan DJ,Wonscheck JH,et al.Laparoscopic varicocelectomy:previminary report of a new technique[J].J Urol,1992,147:73-76.
  • 5Huk J, Fryczkowski M, Bihun M, et al. Laparoscopic varicocele ligation. The comparative assessment of artery-lagating and artery-preserving varicocelectomy Wiad LeK [J]. Polish, 2001, 54:621-631.
  • 6陈洲如,Peter Mark 主编.腹腔镜外科理论与实践[M].昆明:云南科技出版社,1995.436.
  • 7Frank Hinman JR.Atlas of urologic surgery[M].Philadephia:W.B.SaundersCo,1998.352.
  • 8Winfield HN,Donovan JF,See WA et al.Urological laparoscopic surg-ery[J].J Urol,1991,146(4):941~948.
  • 9DonoVan JF,Winfield NH.Laparoscopic varix ligation[J].J Urol,1992,147(1):77~81.
  • 10Abdulmaaboud MR,Shokeir AA,Farage Y et al.Treatment of versus subinguinal approach[J].Urology,1998,51:810~815.

共引文献141

同被引文献78

  • 1陈雪松,秦小川,张静,陈德志.腹腔镜精索血管集束状结扎术与腹腔镜单纯精索内静脉结扎术的疗效比较[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2006,11(6):504-505. 被引量:11
  • 2Dubin L, Amelar RD. Etiologic factors in 1294 consecutive cases of male infertility. Fertil Steril,1971,22(8) : 469 -474.
  • 3Ghanem H, Anis T, Elnashar A, et al. Subinguinal microvaricoce- lectomy velsus retroperi - toneal varicocelectomy : comparative stud- y of complications and surgical outcome. Urology, 2004,64 ( 5 ) :1005 - 1009.
  • 4A1 - Kandari AM, Shabaan H, Ihrahim HM. Comparison ofoutcomes of different varicecelectomy techniques : open inguinal, laparoscop- ic, and subinguinal microscopic varicoeelectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Urology,2007,69 (3) :417 - 420.
  • 5Szabo R, Kessler R. Hydrocele following internal spermatic vein ligation:a retrospective study and review of the literature. J Urol 1984,132 (5) :924 - 925.
  • 6Goldstein M, Gilbert BR, Dicker AP, Dwosh J, Gnecco C. Mi- crosurgical inguinalvaricocelectomy with delivery of the testis: an artery and lymphatic sparingtechnique. J Urol, 1992,148 : 1808 - 1811.
  • 7Oswald J, Komer I, Riccabona M. The use of isosulphan blue to identify lymphatic vessels in high retroperitoneal ligation of ado- lescent varicocele - avoiding postoperative hydrocele. BJU Int, 2001,87:502 -504.
  • 8Mulrow CD, Oxman AD. The Cochrane Collaboration handbook, Issue 1,2000, Oxford, Update Software.
  • 9Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Sys- tematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [ updated Macch 2011 ]. The Cochrane Collaboration,2011. Available from www. cochranehandbook, org.
  • 10Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Sys- tematicReviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [ updated Macch 2011 ]. Th e Cochrane Collaboration,2011. Available from www. cochranehandbook, org.

引证文献7

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部