期刊文献+

团体依恋的概念与测量:项目因子分析方法的应用 被引量:21

Calibrating Group Attachment Scale:An Application of Item Factor Analysis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 从依恋理论出发,基于Smith等(1999)的研究,论述团体的功能以及可作为个体依恋对象的原因,介绍团体依恋的概念,并以亲密关系经历量表为基础编制了"团体依恋量表"(GAS)。对1571名企业员工进行GAS测量,用组织认同、集体自尊、Rosenberg自尊量表等作为效标考察其信效度。采用项目因子分析(IFA)进行数据分析。采用极大似然法进行模型参数估计。单变量标准化pearson残差分析表明GAS的两因子模型拟合良好;但基于项目反应理论的信度分析表明部分题目及测验总体信度有待提高。效度分析表明团体依恋与关系依恋相应维度间有中等程度相关,显示两者之间的同源性。同时,与团体依恋焦虑相比,团体依恋回避与组织认同和自尊之间存在更强相关。 In accordance with Smith et al.'s (1999) paradigm of developing group attachment measurements, the current research developed the group attachment scale (GAS) based on the experience of close relationship inventory which was widely considered as standard measurement of dyadic attachment. To confirm such conjecture, GAS with several criterion scales were tested in a sample of 1571 employees. Data analysis incorporated item factor analysis (IFA) modeling instead of using traditional confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) based on linear regression. Within the framework of structural equation modeling (SEM), IFA could be formalized as a CFA model with latent response indicator which was supposed to be the underlying score externally manifested by categorical response, so it was also called as categorical confirmatory factor analysis (CCFA). The current research applied maximum likelihood estimator to fit a two-factor non-orthogonal CCFA model for GAS. In terms of univariate standardized Pearson residuals, the CCFA model fitted well to the empirical data. However, item and test information still had much to be desired. Validity analysis showed that group attachment moderately correlated with dyadic attachment, which probably indicated their common antecedent attachment theory. Besides, group attachment avoidance had stronger association than group attachment anxiety with group identification measures, but unexpectedly stronger with the sum-score of Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Possible reasons for such observations were further discussed.
作者 李同归 刘飏
出处 《北京大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期331-342,共12页 Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis
基金 国家科技支撑计划(2009BAI77B04) 国家自然科学基金(50978155)资助
关键词 团体依恋 关系依恋 组织认同 项目因子分析 Fisher信息函数 group attachment dyadic attachment group identification item factor analysis Fisher information function
  • 相关文献

参考文献52

  • 1Bowlby J. Attachment and loss: Vol 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books,1982.
  • 2Ainsworth M, Blehar M, Water E, et al. Patterns of attachment: a psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1978.
  • 3Hazan C, Shaver P. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, 52:511-524.
  • 4Bartholomew K, Horowitz L M. Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991, 61 : 226-244.
  • 5Brumbaugh C, Fraley R C. Adult attachment and dating strategies: how do insecure people attract mates?. Personal Relationships, 2010, 17:599-614.
  • 6Collins N L, Read S J. Cognitive representations of attachment: the structure and function of working models. Advances in Personal Relationships, 1994, 5: 53-90.
  • 7Baldwin M W, Keelan J P R, Fehr B, et al. Social cognitive conceptualization of attachment styles: availability and accessibility effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 71 : 94-109.
  • 8Brennan K A, Clark C L, Shaver P R. Self-report measurement of adult attachment: an integrative overview // Simpson J A, Rholes W F. Attachmenttheory and close relationships. New York: Guilford Press, 1998:46-76.
  • 9李同归,加藤和生.成人依恋的测量:亲密关系经历量表(ECR)中文版[J].心理学报,2006,38(3):399-406. 被引量:471
  • 10中尾连属,加藤和生.成人爱着スタィル尺度の日本语版作成の试.心理学研究,2004,75:154-159.

二级参考文献53

共引文献673

同被引文献203

引证文献21

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部