期刊文献+

索拉非尼联合经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗中晚期肝癌不同血清甲胎蛋白亚组的疗效观察 被引量:11

Sorafenib combined TACE for advanced hepatocellular ca rcinoma according to serum alpha-fetoprotein
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察中晚期肝癌不同血清甲胎蛋白(AFP)亚组应用索拉非尼(多吉美)联合经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)治疗的疗效。方法收集2009年4月至2011年10月经病理证实或临床影像诊断,并符合巴塞罗那肝癌分期(Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer,BCLC)标准的中晚期肝细胞癌患者148例,根据AFP水平分为4个亚组:亚组Ⅰ0~20μg/L;亚组Ⅱ20~400μg/L;亚组Ⅲ400~20000μg/L;亚组Ⅳ>20000μg/L。口服索拉非尼,400mg/次,2次/d,每4~6周根据RECIST标准进行肿瘤应答的评价,并记录不良反应的发生情况,按NCI-CTC(3.0版)评价中位肿瘤进展情况和药物毒性。结果 148例患者中,亚组Ⅰ(B期22例,C期32例):稳定(SD)39例、疾病进展(PD)11例、部分缓解(PR)3例、完全缓解(CR)1例(肝内病灶消失),疾病控制率(DCR)79%,中位肿瘤进展时间(mTTP)为6个月;亚组Ⅱ(B期13例,C期24例):SD22例、PD15例、PR0例、CR0例,DCR59%,mTTP为4个月;亚组Ⅲ(B期14例,C期29例):SD27例、PD16例、PR0例、CR0例,DCR62%,mTTP为4个月;亚组Ⅳ(B期4例,C期10例):SD7例、PD7例、PR0例、CR0例,DCR50%,mTTP为3个月。148例患者总疾病控制率为66%,主要不良反应为手足皮肤反应、腹泻、皮疹、脱发。所有患者的不良反应均经对症处理后缓解,无严重不良反应发生。结论不同AFP亚组患者对索拉非尼的疗效相似,无统计学意义,但AFP在正常值以下者口服索拉非尼的mTTP优于AFP高于正常值者。 Objective To investigate the therapeutic effect of sorafonib combined TACE for advanced hepatocelluar carcinoma( HCC) according to different serum alpha-fetoprotein( AFP)level. Methods Between Apri 2009 and Oct 2011,148 patients were grouped according to different serum AFP level, patients with advanced HCC who had received pathology or clinical diagnosis according to BCLC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer)were enrolled and administered with sorafenib (400 mg for twice per day) combined TACE. The tumor response was evaluated according to REC1ST criteria following every 4-6 weeks, and the reverse reaction were recorded and evaluated according to NCI. CTC (3.0 edition). Results 148 evaluable patients, of which sub-group I ( B stage 22 ; C stage 32) :SD 39, PD 11, PR 3, CR 1 (liver lesions disappeared), disease control rate(DCR) was 79% , the median time to tumor progression asked (mTTP) for 6 months ; sub-group Ⅱ ( B stage 13 ; C stage 24 ) : SD 22, PD 15, PR 0, CR 0, DCR was 59%, mTTP for 4 months; sub-group Ⅲ( B stage 14 ; C stage 29 ) : SD 27, PD 16, PR 0, C R 0, DCR was 62% , mTTP for 4 months;sub-groupⅣ ( B stage d ;C stage 10) :SD 7 ,PD 7 ,PR 0 ,CR 0 ,DCR was 50% ,mTTP for 3 months. Overall disease control rate was 66%. The major adverse events were hand-foot skin reaction, dirrhea, rash and psilosis. Most of them were released after treatment and there was no severe adverse event occurring. Conclusions It is suggested that sorafenib is effective for advanced HCC of different serum AFP level, mTTP are longer in patients with normal AFP than patients with higher AFP.
出处 《中华临床医师杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2012年第7期44-47,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition)
关键词 肝细胞 AFP类 分子靶向治疗 索拉非尼 Carcinoma,hepatocelluar Alpha-fetoproteins Molecular targeted therapy Sorafenib
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献48

共引文献98

同被引文献169

  • 1Li Zhao, Dong-Cheng Mou, Zeng-An Wu, Ji-Run Peng, Lei Huang, Xi-Sheng Leng.Diagnostic value of cancer-testis antigen mRNA in peripheral blood from hepatocellular carcinoma patients[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(32):4072-4078. 被引量:22
  • 2Sersa G, Stabuc B, Cemazar M, Miklavcic D, Rudolf Z. Electrochemotherapy with cisplatin: Clinical experience in malignant melanoma patients. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6(3): 863 -7.
  • 3Alcindor T, Beauger N. Oxaliplatin: A review in the era of molecularly targeted therapy. Curr Onco12011; 18(1): 18-25.
  • 4Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, von Pawel J, Biesma B, Vansteenkiste J, Manegold C, et al. Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy- naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Onco12008:26(21): 3543-51.
  • 5Vogelzang NJ, Rusthoven J J, Symanowski J, Denham C, Kaukel E, Ruffle P, et al. Phase III study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Onco12003; 21(14): 2636-44.
  • 6Chang CL, Hsu YT, Wu CC, Lai YZ, Wang C, Yang YC, et al. Dose-dense chemotherapy improves mechanisms of antitumor immune response. Cancer Res 2013; 73(1): 119-27.
  • 7Hotta K, Matsuo K, Ueoka H, Kiura K, Tabata M, Tanimoto M. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing cisplatin to carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Onco12004; 22(19): 3852-9.
  • 8Sandier A, Gray R, Perry MC, Brahmer J, Schiller JH, Dowlati A, et al. Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non- small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2006; 355(24): 2542-50.
  • 9Yoshimura A, Noro R, Miyanaga A, Mizutani H, Kosaihira S, Minegishi Y, et al. Combination chemotherapy of alternating etoposide and carboplatin with weekly administration of irinotecan and cisplatin in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res 2012; 32(10): 4473-8.
  • 10Socinski M, Langer C, Okamoto I, Hon J, Hirsh V, Dakhil S, et al. Safety and efficacy of weekly nab-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin as first-line therapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 2013; 24(2): 314-21.

引证文献11

二级引证文献97

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部