期刊文献+

乳腺评估容积成像动态增强MR在乳腺良恶性肿块病变中的诊断价值 被引量:3

Diagnostic value of volume imaging for breast assessment dynamic enhanced MR for benign and malignant breast mass
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨乳腺评估容积成像(VIBRANT)动态增强MR在乳腺良恶性肿块病变中的诊断价值。方法选择98例乳腺肿块患者,均接受双侧乳腺钼靶X线摄影和VIBRANT动态增强MR检查,比较两种方法诊断乳腺良恶性肿块的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及诊断符合度。结果共113枚病灶,经病理诊断为恶性57例65枚病灶,良性41例48枚病灶。其中,钼靶X线摄影诊断的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为67.69%(44/65)、68.75%(33/48)、74.58%(44/59)和61.11%(33/54),VIBRANT动态增强MR诊断的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为84.62%(55/65)、89.58%(43/48)、91.67%(55,60)和81.13%(43/53)。两种方法诊断符合度比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论VIBRANT动态增强MR在乳腺良恶性肿块病变中的诊断价值高于钼靶x线摄影。 Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of volume imaging for breast assessment (VIBRANT) dynamic enhanced MR for benign and malignant breast mass. Methods Ninety-eight patients with breast mass underwent both bilateral molybdenum target radiography and VIBRANT dynamic enhanced MR examination. The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnosis accuracy between two methods were compared. Results There were 113 lesions including 65 lesions in 57 malignant cases and 48 lesions in 41 benign cases. The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of molybdenum target radiography were 67.69% (44/65), 68.75% (33/48),74.58% (44/59) and 61.11% (33/54),respectively. The values of VIBRANT dynamic enhanced MR were 84.62% (55/65), 89.58% (43/48), 91.67% (55/60) and 81.13% (43/53), respectively. The difference of the diagnosis accuracy between two methods had statistical significance (P 〈0.05). Conclusion The diagnostic value of VIBRANT dynamic enhanced MR for benign and malignant breast mass is higher than molybdenum target radiography.
作者 张勇
出处 《中国医师进修杂志》 2012年第17期23-25,共3页 Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 磁共振成像 乳腺评估容积成像 Breast neoplasms Magnetic resonance imaging Volume imaging for breastassessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献28

  • 1余永康,杜寿敏,张明满.透照检查在乳腺疾病诊断中的意义[J].重庆医学,1994,23(4):227-227. 被引量:3
  • 2徐开野 唐迪.乳腺X线诊断学[M].上海:上海科技出版社,1990.44.
  • 3徐开森 唐敖荣.乳腺疾病影像诊断与治疗学[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,1996.88.
  • 4Buadu LD, Murakami J, Marayama S, et al. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopaphologic findings and tumor angoigenesis. Radiology, 1996,200:639-649.
  • 5Hulka CA, Edmister WB, Smith BL, et al. Dynamic echo-planar imaging of the breast: experience in diagnosing breast carcinoma and and correlation with tumor angoigenesis. Radiology, 1997,205: 837-842.
  • 6Kinkel K, Hylton MN. Challenges to interpretation of breast MRI.J Magn Reson Imaging,2001,13:821-829.
  • 7Malur S,Wurdinger S, Moriz A, et al. Comparision of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography. Breast Cancer Res, 20
  • 8Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitiation off resonance: clinical experience with pathological correlation. Radiology, 1993,187:493-501.
  • 9徐开野.乳腺疾病影像诊断与治疗[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,1996.87-92.
  • 10鲍润贤.中华医学影像学(乳腺卷)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:68-75.

共引文献74

同被引文献29

引证文献3

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部