期刊文献+

艾森克个性问卷(成人版)计算机自适应测验的信效度研究 被引量:7

Reliability and Validity of the Computerized Adaptive Test of Eysenck Personality Questionnaire(Adult)(EPQ-A-CAT)
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:检验艾森克个性问卷(成人版)计算机自适应测验(EPQ-A-CAT)在实际应用中的测量精准度、效度和测试效率。方法:选取204名大学生被试完成了EPQ-A-CAT的测试,其中120名被试接受了CAT和纸笔两种版式的施测,并对31名被试进行了CAT版式的重测。结果:CAT版式的估计标准误均值在四个分量表中都小于终止规则预设的最小误差值;CAT重测的相关系数分别为0.79(E)、0.85(N)、0.67(P)、0.71(L);CAT版式总体能够节省一半以上的项目,各分量表节省了70%-30%的项目;两个版本测试结果的积差相关系数在E、N、P、L四个分量表中分别为0.85、0.81、0.75和0.74。结论:研究结果证明了EPQ-A-CAT版式是高效、可靠和有效的测量工具。 Objective: A Computerized Adaptive Test of Eysenck Personality Questionnaire(Adult)(EPQ-A-CAT) was administrated under real testing condition to evaluate and validate measurement accuracy,validity,and efficiency.Methods: The EPQ-A-CAT was administered in a sample of 204 college students,of which 120 subjects received the two versions CAT and paper-and-pencil test and 30 subjects received the CAT test-retest.Results: The mean of estimated standard error of CAT under four subscales were all less than the prespecified minimum error values;and the correlations of test-retest were 0.79(E),0.85(N),0.67(P),0.71(L) respectively;item savings were above a half of the total scale,and ranged from 70% to 30% for the four subscales;the Pearson correlation coefficients of the two versions scores were 0.85,0.81,0.75,and 0.74 for the E,N,P,and L subscales.Conclusion: The EPQ-A-CAT proved to be an efficient,reliable and valid measurement tool.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期325-327,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 艾森克个性问卷 计算机自适应测验 实际应用 Computerized adaptive testing Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Practical application
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Weiss DJ. Adaptive testing by computer. Journal of Consult- ing and Clinical Psychology, 1985, 53:774-789.
  • 2Waller NG, Reise SP. Computerized adaptive personality assessment: An illustration with the absorption scale. Jour- nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989, 57: 1071- 1058.
  • 3Roper BL, Ben-Porath YS, Butcher JN. Comparability and validity of CAT with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1995, 65(2): 358-371.
  • 4Forbey JD, Handel RW, Ben-Porath YS. A real data simu- lation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI -A. Computers in Human Behavior, 2000, 16:83-96.
  • 5Reise SP, Henson JM. Computerization and adaptive admin- istration of the NEO PI-R. Assessment, 2000, 7(4): 347- 364.
  • 6Fliege H, Becker J, et al. Development of a computer-ada- ptive test for depression(D-CAT). Quality of Life Research, 2005, 14:2277-2291.
  • 7Fliege H, Becker J, et al. Evaluation of a computer-adaptive test for the assessment of depression. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 2009, 18(1): 23-36.
  • 8Becker J, Fliege H, et al. Functioning and validity of a co- mputerized adaptive test to measure anxiety(A-CAT). De- pression and Anxiety, 2008, 25:E182-E194.
  • 9龚耀先.艾森克个性问卷在我国的修订[J].心理科学通讯,1984,7(4):13-20. 被引量:226
  • 10陈仲庚.艾森克人格问卷的项目分析[J].心理学报,1983,15(2):211-218. 被引量:382

二级参考文献17

  • 1范晓玲,龚耀先,魏勇,谢军.EPQ用电脑与纸笔实施的结果比较[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(4):276-277. 被引量:1
  • 2Anastasi A,Urbina S. Psychological testing(7th Ed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc, 1997. 121-138.
  • 3Smith GT,McCarthy DM. Methodological considerations in the refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 1995,7(3) : 300-308.
  • 4Fabrigar LR,Wegener DT,MacCaUum RC,et al. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychology Methods, 1999,4(3) : 272-299.
  • 5曹亦薇译.芝祐顺著.因素分析法.北京:人民教育出版社.1999.151.
  • 6Streiner DL. Figuring out factors:The use and misuse of factor analysis. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 1994,39 : 135-140.
  • 7Roper BL, Ben-Porath YS, Butcher JN. Comparability and validity of CAT with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1995, 65(2):358-371.
  • 8Forbey JD, Handel RW, Ben-Porath YS. A real data simu- lation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI- A. Computers in Human Behavior, 2000, 16:83-96.
  • 9Gibbons RD, Weiss D J, et al. Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment. Psychiatric Services, 2008, 59(4): 361-368.
  • 10Petersen MA, Groenvold M, et al. Multidimensional CAT of the EORTC QLQ-C30: Basic developments and evaluations. Quality of Life Researeh, 2006, 15:315-329.

共引文献937

同被引文献77

  • 1马小红,孙锦华,姚静,王强,邓伟,孙学礼,刘协和,李涛.分裂样特质与某些基因的相关性分析[J].临床精神医学杂志,2007,17(6):361-364. 被引量:2
  • 2Antune LS, Debossan PF, Bohrer LS, et al.Impact of traumatic dental injury on the quality-of-life of children and adolescents : a case-control study [ J ].Acta Odontol Scand, 2013,71 ( 5 ) : 1123-1128.
  • 3Dudani A, Macpherson A, Tamim H. Childhood behavior problems and unintentional injury: a longitudinal population-based study[J].J Dev Behav Pediatr, 2010,31 (4) : 276-285.
  • 4Katarzyna E, Jacek W. Clinical practice-Dental trauma [ J ].Eur J Pedi- atr,2010,169(9) : 1045-1050.
  • 5Kovacs M,Pacurar M,Petcu B,et al.Prevalence of traumatic dental injuries in children who attended two dental clinics in Targu Mutes between 2003 and 2011[J].Oral Health Dent Manag,2012,11(3) :116-124.
  • 6Ritwik P, Christen M, Joseph H. Epidemiology and outcomes of dental trauma cases from an urban pediatric emergency department [ J J. Dent Traumatology, 2015,31 ( 2 ) : 97 - 102.
  • 7Bordin IA, Rocha MM, Paula CS, et al. Child behavior checklist (CBCL) ,youth self-report(YSR) and tecacher's report form(TRF) : an overview of the development of the original and brazilian versions [ J] .Cadernos De Sande Publica ,2013,29( 1 ) : 13-28.
  • 8Bani M, Bodur H, Kapci EG. Are behaviour risk factors for traumatic dental injuries in childhood different between males and females[ J]. Eur J Paediatr Dent,2015,16( 1 ) :29-32.
  • 9万崇华,张晓磬,李晓梅,杨玉萍,潘家华,段丽萍.慢性病患者生命质量测定量表体系QLICD各量表的测量学特性分析[J].昆明医学院学报,2009,30(8):40-45. 被引量:11
  • 10王津惠,谭秀峰,张庆治.1124例前牙外伤的临床分析[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2010,24(3):172-173. 被引量:13

引证文献7

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部