期刊文献+

国家治理机制与国家审计的三大方向 被引量:17

The National Governance Mechanism and the Three Directions of National Audit
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 委托代理机制下的现代国家治理结构,由于自身存在的信息不对称、目标不一致和利益冲突等内在缺陷,会导致财政预算的滥用、政府(官员)权力的自我膨胀和国家治理绩效的缺失,需要国家治理机制必须内生出一个揭露、控制、监督体系,来防止财政预算的滥用、制约政府(官员)权力的膨胀、促进国家治理的绩效,这就成为国家审计作为国家治理结构内生机制的理论基础和现实需要。为了充分发挥国家审计在国家治理机制中对各种权力的揭露、监督和控制作用,更好地服务于国家的良治、善治,国家审计必须通过对国家财政预算执行情况的监督、政府(官员)权力的制约以及政府治理绩效的促进,来完成自身的使命,由此衍生出了现代国家审计的三大方向:针对政府预算权的"预算执行审计"、针对国家行政权的"管理绩效审计"以及针对国家权力人格化身的政府官员的"经济责任审计"。 Modern national governance structure under the principal agent mechanism, would cause the abuse of fiscal budget, the self-expansion of government (officials) power and the loss of national governance performance, due to the inherent defects such as asymmetric information, different objectives and conflict of interest. To prevent the abuse of financial budget, restrict the swelling of the government power, promote national governance performance, it just need an exposing, controlling, and supervising system, which is born inside the national governance mechanism. It became the theorieal foundation and reality need that the national audit is an endogenous mechanism of national governance structure. In order to give full function of exposing, supervising and controlling various power in the national governance mechanism, and serve the good-governance better, national audit must complete its own mission through the supervision of national financial budget execution, restriction of government (officials) power and promotion of state-governance performance, which led to three directions of the modern national audit such as budget implementation audit for the government budget power, management performance audit for the national executive power and accountability audit for the government official.
作者 李坤
出处 《审计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期20-25,共6页 Auditing Research
关键词 国家治理机制 预算执行审计 管理绩效审计 经济责任审计 national governance mechanism, budget implementation audit, management performance audit, accontability audit
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献32

  • 1杨光斌,郑伟铭.国家形态与国家治理——苏联—俄罗斯转型经验研究[J].中国社会科学,2007(4):31-44. 被引量:74
  • 2赵敦华.《西方哲学通史》第1卷,北京:北京大学出版社,1996年,第108页.
  • 3张金男.政府审计效能之研究--以台湾为例[D].暨南大学,2006:17-20.
  • 4Barzel Y. A theory of the state : economic fights,legal rights, and the scope of the state [ M ]. Cambridge University Press, 2002 : 1.
  • 5Barzel Y. Organizational forms and measurement costs[ J ]. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 2005, 161 (3) : 357-375.
  • 6赵敦华.《西方哲学通史》第1卷,北京大学出版社1996年版,第567页.
  • 7维基百科的“奥卡姆剃刀”词条.
  • 8http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-cn/%E5%A5%A5%E5%8D%Al%E5%A7%86%E5%89%83%E5%88%80.
  • 9http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity.
  • 10约瑟夫·斯蒂格利茨.《发展与发展政策》,纪沫等译,北京:中国金融出版社2009年版,第368页.

共引文献236

同被引文献124

引证文献17

二级引证文献160

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部