期刊文献+

澳大利亚行政公益诉讼原告资格探析 被引量:14

On Plaintiff Qualification for Administrative Public Interest litigation in Australia
原文传递
导出
摘要 澳大利亚某些立法和司法判例确立了行政公益诉讼原告类型和资格。行政公益诉讼原告主要有总检察长、个人和利益团体三类。不同类型的原告有不同的资格条件。 The three main plaintiff types and related qualifications for the administrative public interest litigation are set down by some legislative and judicial cases in Australia, i.e. the attorney-general, individuals and interest groups with separate qualification requirement.
作者 朱应平
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《行政法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期88-97,共10页 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
基金 上海市人文社科基地华东政法大学外国法与比较法研究院课题<澳美两国司法审查原告资格比较研究>的阶段性成果
关键词 澳大利亚 行政公益诉讼 原告资格 Australia Administrative Public Interest Litigation Plaintiff Qualification
  • 相关文献

参考文献71

  • 1Dr Chris McGrath .. "Flying foxes, dams and whales: Using federal environmental laws in the public interest "(2008) 25 EPLJ at 325-327 o.
  • 2" McKinnon v. Secretary, Department of Treasury " , (2005) 145 FCR 70 at [8]-[12].
  • 3Oshlack v. Richmond River Council " , (1998) 193 CLR 72; " Ruddock v. Vadarlis" , (No. 2) (2001) 115 FCR 2290.
  • 4" McKinnon v. Secretary, Department of Treasury " , (2006) 228 CLR 423 at [55]-[56].
  • 5" O' Sullivan v. Farrer " , (1989) CLR 210 at 216.
  • 6" Water Conservation & Irrigation Commission (NSW) v. Browning " , (1947) 74 CLR 492 at 505 per Dixon J.
  • 7(Australian Law Reform Commission) : " Costs Shifting-Who Pays for Litigation "Report No 75 (1995) at [13.2]o.
  • 8" Engadine Area Traffic Action Group Inc v. Sutherland SC (No.2) " , [2004] NSWLEC 434 at [15] per Lloyd J.
  • 9" Costs Shifting-Who Pays for Litigation " , Report No 75 (1995) at [13.2]-[13.14].
  • 10draft Standing (Federal and Territory Jurisdiction )Bill 1985 (Cth).

引证文献14

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部