期刊文献+

EMS第4代碎石清石系统在经皮肾治疗鹿角形肾结石术中的应用价值

EMS Fourth Generation Lithotripsy Qing Stone System in Percutaneous Renal to Treat Staghorn Calculi Clinical Application
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨EMS第4代碎石清石系统在经皮肾治疗鹿角形肾结石术中的方法及临床疗效。方法:选择本院收治住院的90例鹿角形肾结石患者随机分为2组,其中试验组48例,行EMS第4代碎石清石系统;对照组42例,单纯行气压弹道碎石术。术后随访,对比2组患者的临床指标。结果:围术期2组间相比,实验组患者的手术时间、出血量、感染发生率、结石残留率、液体外渗量等临床指标均优于对照组,统计学差异有意义(p<0.05)。结论:在经皮肾治疗鹿角形肾结石手术中,应用EMS第4代碎石清石系统,降低出血、感染、结石残留、液体外渗等手术并发症,缩短手术时间,值得推广。 Objective: To explore the EMS fourth generation of rubble stone cleaning system in percutaneous renal to treat staghorn calculi operative methods and clinical effect. Methods: The hospital treated90 inpatients with renal staghom calculi patients were randomly divided into 2 groups, the treatment group of 48 cases, EMS fourth generation gravel stone cleaning system; the control group of 42 cases, simple pneumatic ballistic lithotripsy. Postoperative follow-up, the two groups were compared to clinical indicators. Results: The perioperative period between the two groups compared with patients in the experimental group, the operation time, amount of bleeding, infection rate, the residual stone rate, liquid leakage and other clinical indicators are better than the control group, statistically significant differences were significant ( P 〈 0.05). Conclusions: In the treatment of percutaneous renal staghom calculi in operation, application of EMS fourth generation of rubble stone cleaning system, reduce bleeding, infection, residual stones, leakage operation complications, shorten operation time, should be worth popularizing.
出处 《中国伤残医学》 2012年第8期16-18,共3页 Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
基金 东莞市科技计划项目
关键词 EMS第4代碎石清石系统 气压弹道碎石术 鹿角形肾结石 EMS fourth generation of gravel stone cleaning system Pneumatic lithotripsy Renal staghorn calculi
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献19

  • 1李建兴,牛亦农,田溪泉,康宁,王学科.经皮肾镜气压弹道联合超声碎石术的安全性及疗效分析[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(28):1975-1977. 被引量:165
  • 2Undre S, Olsen S, Mustafa N, et al. "Pass the ball!"simultaneous flexible nephroscopy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for large residual upper-pole staghorn stone[J].J Endourolo, 2004,18 ( 9 ) : 844 - 847.
  • 3Lahme S, Bichler K H, Strohmaier W L,et al. Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones[J].Eur Urol, 2001, 40(6) :619-624.
  • 4Aron M, Yadav R,Goel R,et al. Multi-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large complete staghorn calculi [J]. Urol Int,2005,75(4) :327-332.
  • 5Davol P E, Wood C, Fulmer B, et al. Success in treating renal calculi with single-access, single-event percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is a routine "second look" necessary[J] ? J Endourol, 2006,20 (5) : 289- 292.
  • 6Guohua Z, Zhong W, Li X,et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a novel single session approach via multiple 14 - 18Fr tracts[J].Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2007, 17 (2) :124-128.
  • 7Neto E A, Mitre A I, Gomes C M, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy with the patient in a modified supine position[J]. J Endourol, 2007,178( 1 ) : 165 - 168.
  • 8Hegarty N J, Desai M M. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy requiring multiple tracts: comparison of morbidity with single-tract procedures [J]. J Endourol, 2006, 20 (10) :753-760.
  • 9Turna B,Nazli O,Demiryoguran S,et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: variables that influence hemorrhage [J]. Urology, 2007,69(4 ) : 603- 607.
  • 10Dore B, Conort P, lrani J, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in subjects over the age of 70: a multicentre retrospective study of 210 cases [J].Prog Urol,2004,14(6) : 1140- 1145.

共引文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部