摘要
在德日刑法中,期待可能性归属于有责性,但它与故意和过失在犯罪论体系中的法律地位不同,故意和过失是有责性的必备要素,期待可能性是作为有责性中的例外因素而存在的。如果我国将期待可能性置于"犯罪——刑事责任——刑罚"模式下的刑事责任中,即可在行为已经完全符合犯罪构成成立犯罪的情况下,适用期待可能性理论进行减轻刑事责任的考量,并且可进一步将期待可能性纳入到刑法中的概括情节和酌定情节,以使期待可能性理论充分发挥其减轻刑事责任的机能。
Anticipated possibility belongs to responsibility in German and Japanese criminal Law, but its legal status in the criminal system is different from intention and negligence. Intention and negligence are essential elements of responsibility, while anticipated possibility is exceptional element of responsibility. If anticipated possibility is placed under the criminal responsibility of ＂crime - criminal liability - penalty＂ model in our country, we can apply anticipated possibility to mitigate criminal responsibility when an act has met the constitutive elements of a crime and has been a crime. If anticipated possibility are furthedy placed into summary circumstances and discretionary circumstances, theory of anticipated possibility can give its full play to mitigate criminal responsibility.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第9期58-63,共6页
Law Science Magazine
基金
2007年陕西省社科基金项目(项目编号:07F015S)阶段性成果
关键词
期待可能性
有责性
犯罪构成
anticipated possibility responsibility constitutive elements of a crime
