期刊文献+

利用新方法确定的30′×30′全球大地水准面模型及其精度评估 被引量:5

A 30′×30′ Global Geoid Model Determined Based on a New Method and Its Validation
原文传递
导出
摘要 利用不同于Stokes、Molodensky等经典理论的新方法确定了30′×30′全球大地水准面。该方法充分利用了高精度地球重力场模型EGM2008、数字高程模型DTM2006.0以及全球地壳密度模型CRUST2.0。计算的30′×30′全球大地水准面与同分辨率的EGM2008大地水准面及美国、澳大利亚GPS水准数据进行了比较,结果表明,计算大地水准面与截断至360阶的30′×30′EGM2008大地水准面的精度相当,在全球范围,两者差值的标准差为2.9cm;在美国、澳大利亚区域,计算大地水准面的精度分别为28cm和14cm。 In this paper a 30′×30′global geoid has been determined based on a new theoretical method,which is quite different from the classical geoid modeling methods(Stokes method,Molodensky method,etc.).This new method takes full advantage of the precise Earth gravity field model EGM2008,digital topographic model DTM2006.0 and global crust density model CRUST2.0.The calculated 30′×30′global geoid is compared to the truncated 30′×30′EGM2008 geoid model and validated by GPS/leveling benchmarks(GPSBMs) in the United States and Australia.The results show that the calculated geoid performs at the same level as the EGM2008 geoid,and the standard deviation of their differences is 2.9 cm globally.The accuracy of the calculated global geoid reaches 28 cm in the United States and 14 cm in Australia.
出处 《武汉大学学报(信息科学版)》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第10期1135-1139,共5页 Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(40974015 41174011) 国家自然科学基金创新群体资助项目(41021061) 国家自然科学基金海外与港澳学者合作研究基金资助项目(41128003)
关键词 新方法 CRUST2.0 全球大地水准面 GPS水准数据 new theoretical method CRUST2.0 global geoid GPS leveling benchmarks
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1晁定波,申文斌,王正涛.确定全球厘米级精度大地水准面的可能性和方法探讨[J].测绘学报,2007,36(4):370-376. 被引量:20
  • 2Pavlis N K,Holmes S 2k, Kenyon S C, Factor J K An Earth Gravitational Model to Degree 2160 EGM2008[C]. Presented at the 2008 General As sembly of the European Geoseiences Union, Vien na, 2008.
  • 3Pavlis N K, Factor J K, Holmes S A. Terrain-re- lated Gravimetric Quantities Computed for the next EGM[C]. The 1st International Symposium of the International Gravity Field Service, Istanbul, 2007.
  • 4Bassin C, Laske G, Masters G. The Current l.imits of Resolution for Surface Wave Tomography in NorthAmerica[J]. EOSTrans AGU, 2000,81:897.
  • 5Shen W B. An Approach for Determining the Pre- cise Global. Geoid[C]. Presmxted at i st Iriterriational Symposium of the IGFS, Istanbul, 2006.
  • 6申文斌,晁定波.实现1°×1°全球cm级大地水准面的一种理论方案[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2008,33(6):612-615. 被引量:2
  • 7Andersen O B, Knudsen P. DNSC08 Mean Sea Sur- face and Mean Dynamic Topography Models[J]. JGeophys Res, 2009, 114, Cll001, doi: 10. 1029/ 2008JC005179.
  • 8Mooney W D, Laske G, Masters G T. CRUST5.1 : A Global Crustal Model at 5°×5°[-J]. J Geophys Res, 1998, 103:727-747.
  • 9Anderson E G. The Effect of Topography on Solu- tions of Stokes Problem[R]. Unisurv S-14, Rep, School of Surveying, University of New South Wales, Kensington, 1976.
  • 10Heck B, Seitz K. A Comparison of the Tesseroid, Prism and Point-mass Approaches for Mass Reduc- tions in Gravity Field Modeling[J]. J Geod, 2007, 81:121-136.

二级参考文献25

共引文献20

同被引文献56

引证文献5

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部