期刊文献+

广州市工作和公共场所室内空气PM_(2.5)浓度调查 被引量:7

Surveys on the level of indoor air particles of PM_(2.5) in work places and public places in Guangzhou
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解广州市主要的公共场所和工作场所室内PM2.5浓度水平和影响因素,为制定相关卫生标准及政策法规提供科学依据。方法通过分层抽样方法抽取10类工作场所及公共场所,使用AM510便携式防爆智能数字粉尘仪进行30min室内空气PM2.5的浓度检测,通过单因素以及多重对应分析等方法对室内PM2.5浓度的影响因素进行分析。结果全市各类场所室内PM2.5平均浓度为61.17μg/m3,其中长途汽车站、火车站等交通场所以及酒店、宾馆等食宿场所浓度较高,均值分别为98.80和76.59μg/m3;单因素分析显示,与中心城区相比,县级市场所的PM2.5浓度水平相对较低(Dunnett-t=-0.19,P=0.003)。闻到油烟味或发现有人正在吸烟的场所的PM2.5浓度水平均高于未发现的(t=3.03,P=0.003;t=2.19,P=0.031);多重对应分析结果显示,室内PM2.5浓度高多与食宿或者交通场所、无禁烟标识、吸烟行为、闻到油烟有关。结论广州市各类场所室内PM2.5浓度水平较高,在酒家、饭店等餐饮场所以及长途汽车站等交通站点污染较严重,应加强对这类场所的监管,保护公众健康。 Objective To study the PM2.5 level and its influencing factors in work places and public places in Guangzhou, so as to provide basic data for establishing the policy and hygienic standard. Methods Based on the stratified sampling method, 10 kinds of indoor sites in workplaces and public places were sampled. AM510 artificial intelligence anti explosion dust detectors were used to test indoor PM2.5 of all selected sites in 30 minutes. Analysis of single factor and correspondence analysis(CA) were applied to analysis associated factors for air indoor PM2.5. Results The average indoor PM2.5 level in all selected places was 61.17 g/m3. The average indoor PM2.5 concentration in bus and train stations, restaurants or hotels were higher(98.80 and 76.59 g/m3) than those in other places. The average indoor PM2.5 concentration of places in the suburbs were lower than that in downtowns(Dunnett t=-0.19,P=0.003). The average indoor PM2.5 concentration of places where there were cooking oil fume or smoking behaviors were higher than that of the places without (t=3.03,P=0.003;t=2.19,P=0.031). Through correspondence analysis, stations, restaurants or hotels, none no smoking ban, smoking behaviors, and cooking oil fume were associated to high indoor PM2.5 concentration. Conclusions The indoor PM2.5 concentration were high in main working places and public places in Guangzhou, especially in stations, restaurants or hotels. Policy making and supervising should be enhanced to protect public health.
出处 《热带医学杂志》 CAS 2012年第10期1252-1254,1267,共4页 Journal of Tropical Medicine
基金 广州市医药卫生科技项目(20121A011110)
关键词 PM2 5 多重对应分析 工作场所 公共场所 PM2.5 correspondence analysis work places public places
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献65

共引文献98

同被引文献71

  • 1张衍燊,杨敏娟,潘小川.空气颗粒物与人群死亡率暴露-反应关系的特征[J].环境与健康杂志,2007,24(10):830-833. 被引量:14
  • 2吴怡.粤菜最环保,川菜油烟大——烹饪产生PM2.5再调查[J].人民文摘,2013,0(12):34-35. 被引量:2
  • 3康纪明,姜垣,林晓光,杨焱,南奕,李竹,刘瑞玲,冯国泽,魏小帅,Mark J.Travers,李强,Andrew Hyland.北京市部分餐厅和酒吧烟草烟雾及影响因素调查[J].中华流行病学杂志,2007,28(8):738-741. 被引量:25
  • 4新华网.PM2.5首次写入政府工作报告.
  • 5CAO J,XU H,XU Q. Fine particulate matter constituents and cardiopulmonary mortality in a heavily polluted Chinese city[J].Environmental Health Perspectives,2012.373-378.
  • 6ITO K,ROBERT M,ZEV R. Fine particulate matter constituents associated with cardiovascular hospitalizations and mortality in New York City[J].Environmental Health Perspectives,2011,(04):467-472.
  • 7SCHNEIDER S,SEIBOLD B,S CHUNK S. Exposure to secondhand smoke in Germany:air contamination due to smoking in German restaurants,bars,and other venues[J].Nicotine Tobacco Res,2008,(03):547-555.
  • 8Schwartz J,Neas LM.Fine particles are more strongly associated than coarse panicles with acute respiratory health effects in schoolchildren[J]. Epidemiology,2000,11(1):6-10.
  • 9Bechtel DG, Waldner CL, Wickstrom M. Associations between immune function in yearling beef cattle and airborne polycyclic aromatichydrocarbons and PM1.0 near oil and natural gas field facilities [J]. Arch Environ Occup Health,2009,64(1):47-58.
  • 10国家环境保护部.GB3095-2012 环境空气质量标准 [S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2012.3.

引证文献7

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部