期刊文献+

A Limited Dependent Variable Analysis of Integrated Pest Management Adoption in Uganda 被引量:2

A Limited Dependent Variable Analysis of Integrated Pest Management Adoption in Uganda
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 Integrated Pest Management (IPM) technologies can reduce pest damage to crops by emphasizing non-chemical control methods thereby reducing potential negative effects of chemicals on the environment while preserving profitability. This study investigates the adoption of eight IPM practices including intercropping, crop rotation, two improved varieties, incorporating a "striga chaser" in sorghum production, changing planting dates, altering planting density and fertilizer use. Explanatory variables include economic factors, social factors, management factors, and institutional factors. Results were consistent across logit and ordered logit analyses. Most factors affecting adoption across all crops and technologies are economic factors, including labor availability, technology resource requirements, technology complexity, and the level of expected benefits. Social factors are generally less associated with IPM technology adoption than either market or institutional factors. Results indicate that the evaluated technologies were scale-neutral and that farmer age and education level did not affect technology adoption.
出处 《Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology(A)》 2012年第10期1162-1174,共13页 农业科学与技术(A)
关键词 IPM LOGIT cumulative logit ADOPTION Uganda. 管理因素 病虫害 变量分析 乌干达 IPM技术 技术资源 化学防治方法 种植密度
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1FAOSTAT, http://www.fao.org, 2012.
  • 2S. Kyamanywa, Current status of IPM in Uganda, in: B. Gebrekidan, J.P. Amirault, T. Abate (Eds.), Proceedings of the IPM Networking in Sub-Saharan Africa Workshop, IPM Networking in Sub-Saharan Africa, Virginia Tech., 1996, pp. 28-36.
  • 3J. Karungi, E. Adipala, P. Nampala, M.W. Ogenga-Latigo,S. Kyamanywa, Pest management in cowpea, Part 3, Quantifying the effect of cowpea field pests on grain yields in Eastern Uganda., Crop Protection 19 (2000) 343-347.
  • 4J. Nabirye, P. Nampala, M.W Kyamanywa, H. Wilson, V Ogenga-Latigo, S. Odeke, et al., Farmer-participatory evaluation of cowpea integrated pest management (IPM) technologies in Eastern Uganda, Elsevier, Crop Protection 22 (2003) 31-38.
  • 5P.J.A. Van der Merwe, Groundnut production in Africa and the role of ICRISAT Lilongwe groundnuts breeding project, in: Proceedings of Stakeholders' Workshop, February 24-25, 2000, Mbale, Uganda.
  • 6A. Sterner, Using IPM as an Added Benefit in Marketing Fresh Produce, A Bountiful Harvest: Minnesota Fruit and Vegetables Growers Manage Pests, 2011, pp. 44-47.
  • 7J. Alwang, Improved Practices Yield Stud Spuds in Ecuador [Online], 2005, IPM CRSP Progress, http://www.oired.vt.edu/ipmcrsp/SuccessStories/Potatoes Ecuador.pdf.
  • 8S. Dasgupta, C. Meisner, D. Wheeler, Is Environmentally Friendly Agriculture Less Profitable for Farmers? Evidence on Integrated Pest Management in Bangladesh [Online], 2007, http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent?fun c=synergy&synergyAction=show TOC &journal Code= raec&volume= 29&issue= 1 &year=20070=-null.
  • 9J. Bonabana-Wabbi, Assessing Factors Affecting Adoption of Agricultural Technologies: The case of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) in Kumi District [Online], Eastern Uganda, MS thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2002, http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd- 12182002-233 120.
  • 10IPM CRSP Website [Online], 2003, http://www.ag.vt.edu/ipmcrs.

同被引文献33

引证文献2

二级引证文献124

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部