期刊文献+

实时耦联动力试验的研究进展 被引量:2

Advancements in real-time dynamic hybrid testing method
原文传递
导出
摘要 实时耦联动力试验将整体结构拆分为数值子结构和物理子结构,采用耦联的数值计算和物理试验来模拟整个系统的动力响应,同时按照实际荷载速率加载试验试件。因此该试验方法综合了拟动力子结构试验和常规振动台试验的优点,既能够进行足尺或大比例尺模型试验,又能够反映速度相关性试件的动力特性。本文首先简要介绍实时耦联动力试验的系统构建和分类,随后详述实时耦联动力试验中的数值积分算法和迟滞补偿方法的研究进展,最后介绍实时耦联试验方法的应用现状。 Real-time dynamic hybrid testing(RTDHT) is a method for simulating dynamic structural responses by splitting the system into numerical and physical substructures,where the numerical substructure is simulated and the physical substructure is tested in parallel.Because the testing specimen is loaded in real time rate,RTDHT combines the advantages of pseudo dynamic substructure testing and conventional shaking-table testing.A full-scale or large-scale model test could be implemented and the rate-dependent behaviors of a specimen could be taken into account.This paper reviews the state of the art of RTDHT.Construction and category of RTDHT system are described,and then recent advancements in some technical issues are reviewed,such as numerical integration algorithm and actuator delay compensation.Finally,some applications of RTDHT are demonstrated.
出处 《水力发电学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期198-207,共10页 Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金(51179093 40974063) 教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"
关键词 振动与波 实时耦联动力试验 综述 数值算法 迟滞补偿 试验应用 vibration and wave real-time dynamic hybrid testing review numerical algorithm delay compensation application
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献148

共引文献74

同被引文献56

  • 1王倩颖,吴斌,欧进萍.考虑作动器时滞及其补偿的实时子结构实验稳定性分析[J].工程力学,2007,24(2):9-14. 被引量:22
  • 2汪强,王进廷,金峰,等.实时耦联动力试验方法评述[c]//第17届全国结构工程学术会议论文集.武汉:工程力学杂志社,2008:178-186.
  • 3Nakashima M, Kato H, Takaoka E. Development of real-time pseudo dynamic testing [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1992, 21(1): 79- 92.
  • 4Williams MS. Real-time hybrid testing in structural dynamics [C]. 5th Australasian Congress on Applied Mechanics, Brisbane, Australia, 2007.
  • 5Shing P B. Real-time hybrid testing techniques [C]. Modem Testing Techniques for Structural Systems: Dynamics and Control. Eds. Bursi OS, Wagg D, Springer Vienna, 2008, 502: 259-292.
  • 6Nakashima M, Masaoka N. Real-time on-line test for MDOF systems [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1999, 28(4): 393-420.
  • 7Horiuchi T, Inoue M, Konno T, Namita Y. Real-time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation and its application to a piping system with energy absorber [J]. Earthquake Engineering &Structural Dynamics, 1999, 28(10): 1121 - 1141.
  • 8Darby A P, Blakeborough A, Williams MS. Real-time substructure tests using hydraulic actuator [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1999, 125(10): 1133- 1139.
  • 9Neild S A, Stoten D P, Drury D, Wagg D J. Control issues relating to real-time substruc~ring experiments using a shaking table [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2005, 34(9): 1171 - 1192.
  • 10Igarashi A, Iemura H, Suwa T. Development of substructured shaking table test method [C]. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 1775, Auckland, New Zealand, 2000.

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部