期刊文献+

Hardinge小切口全髋关节置换术的临床应用研究 被引量:4

Clinical application of Hardinge mini-incision total hip replacement
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究Hardinge小切口全髋关节置换术的可行性和安全性。方法将采用Hardinge小切口全髋关节置换术的83例患者作为研究组,另将同期行传统全髋关节置换术的56例患者作为对照组,比较2组患者疗效和并发症情况。结果研究组患者术中出血、切口长度、术后引流量以及术后疼痛评分均显著低于对照组;2组患者术后6个月的髋关节Harris评分均显著高于术前,且研究组显著高于对照组。结论 Hardinge小切口全髋关节置换术与传统手术相比,具有恢复快、手术切口小、出血量少、遗留疤痕小、创伤小等优点,值得推广。 Objective To study the feasibility and safety of Hardinge mini- incision total hip replacement. Methods 83 patients with Hardinge mini - incision total hip replacement were classified as research group, another 56 patients with traditional total hip replacement were classified as control group. The effect and complications were compared between 2 groups. Results The op- eration bleeding, incision length, drainage amount and postoperative pain score in the research group were obviously lower than that in the control group. 6 months after operation, the Harris score of hip joint in both of two groups were obviously higher than pre - operation, and the score in research group was obviously higher than that in control group. Conclusion Compared with the traditional operation, the Hardinge mini- incision total hip replacement has the advantages of quick recovery, small incision, less amount of bleeding, small scar and trauma, so it is worthy of popularization.
作者 周波 王强
出处 《实用临床医药杂志》 CAS 2012年第23期86-87,共2页 Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
基金 中国高校医学期刊临床专项资金(11220238)
关键词 Hardinge入路 小切口 髋关节 置换 Hardinge approach mini-incision hip joint replacement
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献70

共引文献62

同被引文献49

  • 1郑稼,金毅.置管冲洗在关节假体早期感染中的应用[J].河南医学研究,2008,17(1):36-37. 被引量:3
  • 2张雪莲.18例双侧髋关节置换围手术期护理[J].实用临床医药杂志(护理版),2007,3(1):91-92. 被引量:6
  • 3Grimer R J, Abudu A. Infection after total hip arthroplasty [J].J Bone Joint Surg. Br, 2005, 87(4): 588.
  • 4Tsukayama D T, Goldberg V M, Kyle R. Diagnosis and management of infection after to tal knee arthrop lasty[J ]. J 13one Joint Surg(Am), 2003, 85(11) : 575.
  • 5Kaltsas D S. Infection after total hip arthroplasty[J]. Ann R Coil Surg Engl, 2004, 86(4): 267.
  • 6Heintzbergen S, Kulin NA, Ijzerman MJ, et al. Cost-utility of met- al-on-metal hip resurfacing compared to conventional total hip re- placement in young active patients with osteoarthritis [J]. Value Health, 2013, 16(6): 942-952.
  • 7Park KS, Oh CS, Yoon TR. Comparison of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty versus conventional hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in active elderly patients [J]. Chonnam Med J, 2013, 49(2): 81-86.
  • 8Inaba Y, Kobayashi N, Yukizawa Y, et al. Little clinical advantage of modified Watson-Jones approach over modified mini-incision di- rect lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty [J]. J Arthro- plasty, 2011, 26(7): 1117-1122.
  • 9Foucher KC, Wirnmer MA, Moisio KC, et al. Time course and ex- tent of functional recovery during the first postoperative year after minimally invasiv: total hip arthroplasty with two different surgical approaches-a randomized controlled trial [J]. J Biomech, 2011, 44 (3): 372-378.
  • 10Mouilhade F, Matsoukis J, Oger P, et al. Component positioning in primary total hip replacement: a prospective comparative study of two anterolateral approaches, minimally invasive versus gluteus me- diushemimyotomy [J]. Orthop Traumatol Stag Res, 2011, 97(1): 14-21.

引证文献4

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部