摘要
"三一律"的合理性在于,经由时间与地点的限定使亚里士多德含糊的情节整一性有了明确的规则。但由于这个规则不是从情节的本质属性上演化出来的,于是"三一律"又极易成为实现情节整一性的障碍。而且,"三一律"忽视了复杂行动与简单行动在转化为内部感觉时的无差别性。虽然在经验上复杂行动与简单行动在时间上的差异通常是显著的———这使它无法解释何以删减某些行动不至于破坏情节整一性。
The rationality of 'three unities' lies in that Aristotle's obscure unity of action becomes an explicit rule through the restriction of time and place.However,since the rule is not derived from the essential property of action,'three unities' is rather liable to be the obstacle for the realization of the unity of action.Furthermore,'three unities' overlooks the indiscrimination while complex actions and simple actions transform into internal feelings,although in experience the difference in time between complex action and simple action is usually obvious,which makes it impossible to explain why some action is crossed out without undermining the unity of action.
出处
《戏剧（中央戏剧学院学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第4期16-23,共8页
Drama:The Journal of the Central Academy of Drama
关键词
三一律
情节
因果性
three unities,action,causality
