期刊文献+

不同浓度罗哌卡因复合诺杨硬膜外阻滞用于剖宫产的临床观察 被引量:4

Comparative study of different concentration of ropivacaine combined with butophanol on epidural anesthesia for cesarean section
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨3种不同浓度罗哌卡因复合诺杨硬膜外阻滞应用于剖宫产镇痛效果及最佳浓度选择。方法 1620例行剖宫产术患者随机分为3组,A组(542例)、B组(530例)、C组(548例)。所有患者均采用硬膜外阻滞,分别给予0.10%、0.15%和0.20%罗哌卡因复合0.004%诺杨行硬膜外自控镇痛(PECA)。结果 B组、C组感觉阻滞起效时间、痛觉消失时间显著短于A组(P<0.05),B组与C组比较则无显著性差异(P>0.05);A组、B组运动阻滞起效时间与时效及运动阻滞程度明显高于C组(P<0.05),而A组与B组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05);A组和B组恶心呕吐、嗜睡、皮肤瘙痒等不良反应发生率均显著低于C组(P<0.05)。结论 0.15%罗哌卡因+0.004%诺杨应用于剖宫产术硬膜外阻滞,可提供较好的麻醉镇痛效果,并可减少不良反应。 Objective To explore the clinical effect of three concentrations of ropivacaine combined with butophanol on epidural anesthesia for cesarean section, and identify the optimal concentration. Methods 1620 patients treated with cesarean section were randomly divided into three groups, Group A(n=542), Group B (n=530) and Group C (n=548). All the patients were performed by epidural anesthesia, and given 0. 004% butophaaol combined with 0. 10% ,0. 15%, 0.20% ropivacaine respectively. Results The onset time of sense block, pain disappeared time in Group B and Group C were significantly shorter than that of Group A (P〈0. 05), while there was not significantly difference between B group and C group (P〉0.05). Compared with Group A and Group B, the onset time, duration and degree of motor block in Group C was significantly longer, while there was not significantly difference between Group A and Group B (P〉0.05). The rate of side effect including nausea and vomiting, sleepiness and itchy skin in Group A and Group B was significantly lower than that of Group C(P〈0. 05). Conclusion The concentration of 0.15% ropivacaine+0. 004% butophanol in epidural anesthesia for cesarean section can provide good effect of anesthesia and analgesia, and reduce the side effect.
出处 《西部医学》 2013年第1期111-113,共3页 Medical Journal of West China
关键词 罗派卡因 浓度 诺杨 剖宫产 硬膜外阻滞 Ropivacaine Butophanol Concentration Cesarean section Epidural anesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献31

  • 1谢致,周守静,俞莹芳.布托啡诺与吗啡用于开胸术后患者自控镇痛的比较[J].复旦学报(医学版),2007,34(2):299-301. 被引量:6
  • 2Chari P,Ghai B. Comparison of butorphanol and thiopentone vs fentanyl and thiopentone for laryngeal mask airway insertion. J Clin Anesth,2006,18:8-11.
  • 3Miller PL,Ernst AA. Sex differences in analgesia:a randomized trial of rnu versus kappa opioid agonists[J]. South Med J, 2004,97(1) :35-41.
  • 4Chu CC, Chen JY, Chen CS, et al. The efficacy and safety of transnasal butorphanol for postoperative pain control following lower laparoscopic surgery. Acta Anaeslhesiol Taiwan, 2004, 42 : 203-207.
  • 5Gorletto F, Raisis A A, Brearley J C. Comparison of morphine and butorphanol as pre-anaesthetic agents in combination with romifidine for field castration in ponies [J]. Vet Anaesth Amalg, 2005, 32( I ) : 16-22.
  • 6Detlef E R, Morten A, Dietmar S, et al. A comparison of patientcontrolled analgesia with lornoxicam versus morphine in patients undergoing lumber disk surgery [J]. Anesth Analg, 1998,86(5 ) : 1045.
  • 7Desjardins P J, Nonis L H. Cooper S A, et al. Analgesic efficacy of intranasal butorphanol (stadol NS) in the treatment of pain after dental impaction surgery[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2000, 58: 19.
  • 8Zhao Y, Guo Q L, Zhang Z, Three subanaesthetic dose ketamines mixed with butorphanol in the postoperative continuous intravenous analgesia [J]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban, 2008,33 ( 1 ) : 266-269.
  • 9Chu C C, Chen J Y, Chen C S, et al. The efficacy and safety oftransnasal butorphnol for postoperative pain control followinglower laparoscopic surgery- [J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan, 2004,42(3): 203.
  • 10NANCRROW C, RUTTON A J, RUNEIMAM W B,et al. Myocardial and cerebral drug concentrations and the mechanisms of death after later intravenous doses of lidocaine, bupivacaine and ropivacaine in the sheep [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 1989,69(2) :276.

共引文献46

同被引文献46

引证文献4

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部