摘要
目的探讨中年患者生物型全髋置换和骨水泥全髋置换后的效果比较。方法 2008年3月～2010年3月来本院治疗髋骨的患者,采用生物型全髋置换的中年患者为A组,采用骨水泥全髋置换的中年患者为B组,每组50例。结果 A组中治疗很满意的患者为42例,2例患者不满意;B组患者很满意为30例,不满意的有6例。A组中有2例患者的全髋置换处出现松动,B组有6例患者有髋骨松动、髋骨疼痛等多发不良症状。结论随访比较分析发现,生物型全髋置换的治疗效果更好,患者的满意度高,值得临床推广。
Objective To explore the effect comparison between biological total hip arthroplasty and bone-cement total hip arthroplasty for middle-aged patients. Methods The patients with hip were treated in our hospital from March 2008 to March 2010, used biological type total hip replacement of middle-aged patients as group A, the bone cement total hip replacement of middle-aged patients as group B, each group of 50 cases. Results The therapy was satisfaction of patients for 42 cases in group A, 2 cases were not satisfied; The patients satisfied for 30 cases in group B, not satisfied in 6 cases. 2 cases with total hip replacement place to appear, become loose in group A; 6 patients had loose hip, hip pain, the multiple adverse symptoms in group B. Conclusion Follow-up comparison indicates that the effect of biological total hip arthroplasty is better with good satisfaction and it is worth clinical promotion.
出处
《中国当代医药》
2013年第1期42-43,共2页
China Modern Medicine
关键词
中年患者生物型全髋置换
骨水泥全髋置换
随访比较
效果分析
Biological total hip arthroplasty for middle-aged patient
Bone-cement total hip arthroplasty
Follow-up comparison
Effect analysis
