摘要
目的比较CellavisionDM96仪器与手工分类法在鉴定结果上的差异性，对其在临床中的应用进行评价。方法随机选取40个需要手工进行白细胞分类的标本，使用仪器与手工方法分别进行白细胞分类鉴定。结果CellavisionDM96仪器与手工分类有着很好的相关性，其中以分叶核中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞最佳，分别为O．78和0．76。结论Cel—lavisionDM96作为一种全新的血细胞形态鉴定仪器，能够给临床实验室提供准确、可靠的分析数据，同时也提高了工作效率，是一项值得推广的新技术。
Objective To compare the accuracy and precision of Cellavision DM96 in identifying all classes of leucocytes with reference manual differentials. Methods 40 random samples required a full microscopic differential count were selected, which were identified by DM96 and manual ways. Results Correlation coefficients were highest for segmented neutrophils and lymphocytes,which were respectively 0.78 and 0.76. Conclusion The Cellavision DM96 is reliable as a novel instru- ment and certainly has a place in the hematology laboratory where it should improve work efficient,which is worth of sprea- ding.
出处
《现代检验医学杂志》
CAS
2012年第6期113-115,共3页
Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
