期刊文献+

标准通道与微通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的疗效对比 被引量:11

Clinical efficacy comparison of micro-channel and standard channel percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of kidney calcui
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨标准通道与微通道经皮肾镜取石(PCNL)对肾结石的疗效。方法:选择2010年1月~2011年12月,在钦州市第二人民医院泌尿外科治疗的肾结石患者176例,按随机数字表将其分为两组,两组均为88例。第一组(标准通道组)行经标准通道皮肾镜取石(SPCNL),第二组(微通道组)行微通道经皮肾镜取石(MPCNL)。比较和分析两组的手术时间和出血量、结石清除率、术后恢复及不良反应情况等。结果:MPCNL的平均手术时间和出血量分别为76.26±13.44min、和63.31±8.0 9ml,显著低于SPCNL组(P<0.05);SPCNL一次结石总清除率和单发结石清除率分别为77.27%和79.63%,与MPCNL组差异未达到显著水平(P>0.05),多发结石清除率和显鹿角结石清除率分别达到73.52%和62.50%显著高于MPCNL组(P<0.05);MPCNL组术后可下次活动和住院时间分别为(33.10±5.90)h和(4.00±1.40)d显著短于MPCNL组(P<0.05),而术后24h小时Hb和Scr水平分别为132.25±7.30(g/L)和95.67±16.49(umol/L),且显著高于MPCNL组(P<0.05);SPCNL和MPCNL术后总并发症率分别为31.82%和29.55%,两组差异未达到显著水平(P>0.05)。结论:标准通道与微通道经皮肾镜取石疗效显著,且各有优势,应根据患者和结石的具体综合考虑选择合适的通道经皮肾镜取石。 Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of micro-channel and standard channel per- cutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of kidney calcui. Methods.A total of 176 kidney calcui patients hospitalized in our hospital from January 2010 to December 2011 were randomly selected and divided intotwo groups, each group had 88 cases. The first group (the standard channel group) underwent standard channel percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SPCNL), while the second group (the micro channel group) had micro channel percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL). Length of operation time and the bleeding vol- ume, stone-free rate, postoperative recovery and the adverse reactions were compared and analyzed after treatment. Results.The average length of operation time and bleeding volume of the MPCNL group was (76.26±13.44) rain and (63.3±8.09) mL, significant lower than that of the SPCNL group (P〈0. 05). The total stone clearance and solitary stone clearance rates of the SPCNL group was 77.27% and 79. 63%, the differences between two group did not achieve a significant level (P〉0.05). while the multiple stones clearance rate and staghorn stone clearance rate of the SPCNL group was73.52% and 62.50 %, both were significant higher than those of the MPCNL group (P〈0.05). Length of hospital stay and mobility time of the MPCNL group was (33.10±5.90) h and (4.00±1.40) d, significantly shorter than that in the SPCNL group (P〈O. 05). The 24h hours Hb and Scr levels of the MPCNL group after treatment were (132.25±7.30) g/L and (95.67±16.49) umol/L, significant higher than that in the SPCNL group (P〈 0.05). The total postoperative complication rates of the SPCNL and MPCNL group was 31. 82% and 29.55 %,respectively, showing no significant difference (P〉 0. 05). OonclusJons: Both standard channel and micro channel percutaneous nephrolithotomy shows good effects in the treatment of kidney calcui with its own advantages, thus choice of the two should be based on status of patients and symptoms.
出处 《海南医学院学报》 CAS 2013年第2期219-223,共5页 Journal of Hainan Medical University
基金 中国高校医学期刊临床专项资金项目(112210518)~~
关键词 肾结石 微通道 标准通道 经皮肾镜取石 Kidney calcui Micro-channel Standard channel Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献56

共引文献106

同被引文献96

  • 1黄超,成泽民,曾东升,杜义堂,包伟.微创经皮肾镜取石术与标准通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的临床对比观察[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(35):265-266. 被引量:2
  • 2魏武,葛京平,马宏青,张征宇,周文泉,周水根,王冬,高建平.经皮肾镜钬激光碎石术全身炎症反应综合征发生的相关因素[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2007,22(4):264-266. 被引量:129
  • 3王少刚,席启林,叶章群,刘继红,张旭,庄乾元,杨为民,陈志强,杜广辉,陈忠,胡志全,郭小林,宋晓东,余虓.经皮肾镜与微创经皮肾取石术治疗肾结石的效果比较[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(6):393-396. 被引量:80
  • 4徐桂彬,李逊,何朝辉,何永忠,雷鸣.微创经皮肾镜取石术出血量影响因素的分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(7):456-459. 被引量:123
  • 5Preminger GM,Assimos DG,Lingeman JE,et al.AUA Nephrolithiasis Guideline Panel. Chapter I:AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: Diagnosis and treatment recommendations[J].J Urol,2005,173(6):1991-2000.
  • 6Jackman SV,Docimo SG,Cadeddu JA,et al.The "mini-perc" technique:a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy.World J Urol,1998,16(6):371-374.
  • 7Li LY,Gao X,Yang M,et al.Does a smaller tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy contribute to less invasiveness? A prospective comparative study.Urology,2010,75(1):56-61.
  • 8Higgins JPT,Green S(editors).Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0[updated September 2011] .The Cochrane Collaboration,2011,Available from.
  • 9WELLS G,SHEA B,O'Connell D,et al.The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non-randomised studies in meta-analyses,2010.Available from URL.
  • 10Cheng F,Yu W,Zhang X,et al.Minimally invasive tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones.J Endourol,2010,24(10):1579-1582.

引证文献11

二级引证文献94

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部